2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy analysis of CaCO3 calcination with CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are inherent thermodynamic advantages to this process, compared to other post-combustion CCS technologies, and a number of researchers have determined that this process imposes an efficiency penalty on a power station significantly lower than that imposed by either oxyfuel combustion or MEA scrubbing, at 6-8% points, as opposed to 10 -12 points for the latter technologies. (Romeo et al, 2010, Lin et al, 2011, Daval et al, 2011, Martinez et al, 2012 One issue which has received significant attention during previous research is that the ability of CaO produced from natural limestone reduces significantly (from ~ 0.7 mol CO2/mol CaO) when it is first used to capture CO2 to a significantly lower level (~0.1 mol CO2/mol CaO) after 30 cycles of calcination and carbonation (Fennell et al, 2007a, Blamey et al, 2010a) (hereafter, the number of moles of CO2 reacted per mole of CaO will be referred to as the carrying capacity of the limestone) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are inherent thermodynamic advantages to this process, compared to other post-combustion CCS technologies, and a number of researchers have determined that this process imposes an efficiency penalty on a power station significantly lower than that imposed by either oxyfuel combustion or MEA scrubbing, at 6-8% points, as opposed to 10 -12 points for the latter technologies. (Romeo et al, 2010, Lin et al, 2011, Daval et al, 2011, Martinez et al, 2012 One issue which has received significant attention during previous research is that the ability of CaO produced from natural limestone reduces significantly (from ~ 0.7 mol CO2/mol CaO) when it is first used to capture CO2 to a significantly lower level (~0.1 mol CO2/mol CaO) after 30 cycles of calcination and carbonation (Fennell et al, 2007a, Blamey et al, 2010a) (hereafter, the number of moles of CO2 reacted per mole of CaO will be referred to as the carrying capacity of the limestone) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A biomass boiler is needed in the Ca(OH) 2 scenario and expenses for capital and labor therefore increased. Heat cost in the Ca(OH) 2 scenario was slightly increased, due to the need for 178 kJ to convert 1 mol CaCO 3 into CaO and CO 2 . The price of Ca(OH) 2 is only $70/ton (see Appendix, Table A4a), and, with a recycling recovery of about 85%, the estimated chemical cost for Ca(OH) 2 protein extraction was only $2/ton GTR (Table ).…”
Section: Sustainability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, Li−CO 2 /O 2 batteries have the potential to be a revolutionary solution for carbon capture and electrical energy generation among various methodologies, including chemical and physical methods, currently under development . However, the discharge product Li 2 CO 3 is difficult to decompose and may result in a large overpotential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, LiÀ CO 2 /O 2 batteries have the potential to be a revolutionary solution for carbon capture and electrical energy generation among various methodologies, including chemical and physical methods, currently under development. [10][11][12] However, the discharge product Li 2 CO 3 is difficult to decompose and may result in a large overpotential. Surprisingly, a high dielectric medium can realize the reversible reaction of Li 2 CO 3 , which provides a mechanism for the development of a reusable Li-air battery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%