1971
DOI: 10.1364/josa.61.001666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energies of the Electronic Configurations of the Singly, Doubly, and Triply Ionized Lanthanides and Actinides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
112
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They show generally some stuctures. The plot of the lowest transition energy versus the number of f electrons also follows the well-known energy variation calculated by Brewer [4] for inter-configuration transitions occurring in the tripositive lanthanide free ions (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Intra-configuration Transitionssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…They show generally some stuctures. The plot of the lowest transition energy versus the number of f electrons also follows the well-known energy variation calculated by Brewer [4] for inter-configuration transitions occurring in the tripositive lanthanide free ions (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Intra-configuration Transitionssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For each of these M 2+ ions, the lowest-lying reactive state with two non-f valence electrons is f n-2 d 2 , with the promotion energies to these states estimated as >7 eV [42]. In view of these high promotion energies to a prepared divalent bonding state for the M 2+ ions, it is expected that the bonds in M 2+ -O should be much weaker those in M + -O (the lower promotion energies for the M + ions are given in Table 1).…”
Section: Reactions Of M 2+ Ions With Oxidantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the odd-parity configurations 4f 11 5d 2 , 4f 11 6s 2 and 4f 11 5d6s and the even-parity configurations 4f 11 5d6p and 4f 11 6s6p were investigated. For these configurations, the average energy level values were adjusted to reproduce the energies predicted by Brewer (1971) for the lowest level of each configuration, i.e. 4f 11 5d 2 6 L 11/2 (E = 85 000 ± 9000 cm −1 ), 4f 11 6s 2 4 I 15/2 (E = 115 000 ± 7000 cm −1 ), 4f 11 5d6s 6 K 13/2 (E = 100 000±5000 cm −1 ), 4f 11 5d6p 6 L 11/2 (E = 136 000±7000 cm −1 ) and 4f 11 6s6p 6 I 15/2 (E = 150 000 ± 9000 cm −1 ).…”
Section: Hfr Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%