2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetic and exergetic comparison of basic and ejector expander refrigeration systems operating under the same external conditions and cooling capacities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ersoy and Bilir Sag [187] tested a R124a EERS and, depending on the operating condition, the COP was 6.2-14.5% higher than that of the conventional system. Bilir Sag et al [182] (experimental study using R134a) reported an increase of COP by 7.34-12.87% and an increase of the exergy efficiency of 6.6-11.24% compared to a conventional system. An EERS provide performance enhancement due to two effects: the liquid-fed evaporator and work recovery.…”
Section: Ejector Expansion Refrigeration System (Eers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ersoy and Bilir Sag [187] tested a R124a EERS and, depending on the operating condition, the COP was 6.2-14.5% higher than that of the conventional system. Bilir Sag et al [182] (experimental study using R134a) reported an increase of COP by 7.34-12.87% and an increase of the exergy efficiency of 6.6-11.24% compared to a conventional system. An EERS provide performance enhancement due to two effects: the liquid-fed evaporator and work recovery.…”
Section: Ejector Expansion Refrigeration System (Eers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [19] investigated the performance of an EEC using R1234yf and R134a and found that the R1234yf EEC has lower COP and volumetric cooling capacity (VCC), but it offers greater COP and VCC improvement potential compared with that of R134a EEC. Bilir et al [20] experimentally found that the use of an ejector in place of the throttle valve in a R134a refrigeration cycle will improve the COP and exergy efficiency by 7.34%-12.87% and 6.6%-11.24%, respectively, under the same external operating conditions. Lawrence and Elbel [21] conducted an experimental investigation of EEC that can provide multiple evaporation temperatures, and found that the cycle showed maximum COP improvements of 12% with R1234yf and 8% with R134a compared with a two evaporation temperatures basic cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the maximum injection fraction considered (X inj = 10%) a reduction of ∼8% is observed for both quantities. These results show that the injection of droplets effectively attenuates the shock wave intensity in the CAS, thus affecting one of the main sources of irreversibilities inside the ejector [12,22]. At the maximum injected fraction considered, the entropy generation between sections L5 and L7 is reduced by 10% relative to the case without injection.…”
Section: Shock Intensitymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The exergy destruction index ξ i compares the exergy destroyed within a specific region of the ejectorḊ i to the total exergy destroyed through the deviceḊ ej [12]:…”
Section: Exergy Destruction Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation