2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular thrombectomy with and without preceding intravenous thrombolysis for treatment of large vessel anterior circulation stroke: A cross-sectional analysis of 50,000 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observational study design inherent to analysis of administrative registry data, in which all diagnoses and procedures are identified by billing codes, is the primary limitation of this investigation. 35,36 These ICD codes do not carry a temporal qualifier, meaning that their occurrence with respect to vasospasm (before or after) cannot be ascertained, which limits conclusions regarding causality. 11 The inability of the NIS to accurately identify vasospasm and DCI and to differentiate these entities from ischemia and infarction due to the mass effect from hematoma expansion, increased intracranial pressure, or iatrogenic causes may have led to overreporting and a potential type I error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observational study design inherent to analysis of administrative registry data, in which all diagnoses and procedures are identified by billing codes, is the primary limitation of this investigation. 35,36 These ICD codes do not carry a temporal qualifier, meaning that their occurrence with respect to vasospasm (before or after) cannot be ascertained, which limits conclusions regarding causality. 11 The inability of the NIS to accurately identify vasospasm and DCI and to differentiate these entities from ischemia and infarction due to the mass effect from hematoma expansion, increased intracranial pressure, or iatrogenic causes may have led to overreporting and a potential type I error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, a cross-sectional population-based assessment of nearly 50 000 patients with AIS treated with MT showed that although preceding IVT was associated with higher rates of intracerebral hemorrhage, it may confer a clinical benefit with respect to clinical outcome at discharge and shorter hospital lengths of stay. 57 A pooled analysis of the TITAN (Thrombectomy In Tandem lesions) and ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) Registries suggested also that bridging therapy with IVT in patients with AIS because of anterior tandem occlusion may improve functional outcome, even in the setting of acute cervical carotid artery stenting during MT, without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic complications. 58 Moreover, in tandem occlusion related to cervical internal carotid artery dissection, prior IVT before MT was also associated with a higher rate of intracranial successful reperfusion (83% versus 64%) and a lower rate of sICH (4.3% versus 14.8%).…”
Section: Thrombolysis Bridge Is Down?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History of varicella was found in 12.5% (6 of 48 patients with available data) and potentially embolic heart condition in 16.2% (11). Median pedNIHSS at admission was 13 (IQR, 7-19) and was higher in patients treated with EVT (16 [IQR,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) vs 9 [IQR, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]; P = .004). Median time from stroke onset to imaging was 2 hours and 54 minutes (IQR, 2 hours to 4 hours and 49 minutes) and was longer in patients treated with EVT (3 hours and 7 minutes; IQR, 2 hours and 3 minutes to 6 hours and 24 minutes vs 2 hours and 39 minutes; IQR, 1 hour and 51 minutes to 4 hours and 13 minutes; P = .04).…”
Section: Characteristics At the Acute Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the generalizability of these results remains questionable because of the overrepresentation of cardioembolic events in this study and the risk of selection bias over a 220-month inclusion period in 27 centers. Recently, Dicpinigaitis et al 10 extracted data on a cohort of 190 children treated with EVT from the US National Inpatient Sample and supported the safety profile of EVT in a large pediatric sample. However, the generalizability of results remains limited by many approximations regarding the population characteristics and outcomes owing to the lack of key variables, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score or modified Rankin Scale score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%