2022
DOI: 10.1002/ar.25048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endostructural and periosteal growth of the human humerus

Abstract: The growth and development of long bones are of considerable interests in the fields of comparative anatomy and palaeoanthropology, as evolutionary changes and adaptations to specific physical activity patterns are expected to be revealed during bone ontogeny. Traditionally, the cross‐sectional geometry of long bones has been examined at discrete locations usually placed at set intervals or fixed percentage distances along the midline axis of the bone shaft. More recently, the technique of morphometric mapping… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difficulties with morphological studies on juvenile long bones prior to the development of anatomical landmarks have been a topic of more recent investigation. To remedy such issues of unidentifiable landmarks, O'Mahoney et al (2023) has integrated cross‐sectional and GMM, through morphological mapping, to immature humeri to examine standard biomechanical properties such as cortical thickness, surface curvature, and pseudolandmarks across the diaphysis. The findings demonstrated the variability of cortical thickness and morphology along the shaft during childhood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties with morphological studies on juvenile long bones prior to the development of anatomical landmarks have been a topic of more recent investigation. To remedy such issues of unidentifiable landmarks, O'Mahoney et al (2023) has integrated cross‐sectional and GMM, through morphological mapping, to immature humeri to examine standard biomechanical properties such as cortical thickness, surface curvature, and pseudolandmarks across the diaphysis. The findings demonstrated the variability of cortical thickness and morphology along the shaft during childhood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%