1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(90)70911-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
1
4

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
78
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Stiegmann et al (11) demonstrated then that not only PEG was economically superior to SG, but that morbidity and mortality were also equivalent. Later, it has become clear that PEG has, in fact, lower complication rate than SG, as demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial by Ljundhal et al (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stiegmann et al (11) demonstrated then that not only PEG was economically superior to SG, but that morbidity and mortality were also equivalent. Later, it has become clear that PEG has, in fact, lower complication rate than SG, as demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial by Ljundhal et al (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] On the other hand, some studies do not confirm these results. 29,30 Furthermore, PEG and PRG placements are accompanied by a certain risk of morbidity and mortality. [31][32][33] Rather low survival rates in patients who received an SG or PRG tube are explained by the fact that these groups consisted mainly of patients with advanced cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract who died of their underlying disease.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In various series, PEGs have been found to be safer and less costly than surgical gastrostomies [3,6,7] with an overall complication rate of 10-25% [2,8,9]. Complications have included aspiration pneumonia, hemorrhage, wound infection, septicemia, peritonitis, and inter- nal migration of the tube with gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction [2,4,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%