2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft

Abstract: Despite our initial concerns of damaging the venous conduit with a minimally invasive approach to saphenous vein harvest, EVH in our experience has resulted in a trend toward improved patency rates and decreased infectious wound complications while affording the benefit of improved cosmesis. An endoscopic approach results in smaller incisions, decreased interventions for occlusion, and improved outcomes compared with OVH. EVH is the procedure of choice for harvesting saphenous vein for femoral to below the kne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that patency and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups, and this held out in subgroup analysis as well, when nonreversed and reversed conduits were compared and found to have comparable patency rates. In this respect, our findings are similar to reports by Wartman et al 19 and Gazoni et al,32 who showed similar patency between the two techniques. In our study, 36% of EVH patients underwent femoral endarterectomy, indicating proximal disease that was simultaneously treated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We showed that patency and reintervention rates were similar between the two groups, and this held out in subgroup analysis as well, when nonreversed and reversed conduits were compared and found to have comparable patency rates. In this respect, our findings are similar to reports by Wartman et al 19 and Gazoni et al,32 who showed similar patency between the two techniques. In our study, 36% of EVH patients underwent femoral endarterectomy, indicating proximal disease that was simultaneously treated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Yet, the operative trauma through extensive undermining of the skin in an ischemic leg is substantial, and no reduction of wound complications or LOS has been reported. 23 The study revealed a significant increase in overall SSIs at the site of exposure for the proximal anastomosis in group B patients (P ϭ .041). We believe this difference is not correlated with the use of preoperative DVM, because most of the proximal anastomoses were performed in the groin, where preoperative DVM does not play a major role in preventing SSI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The less ischemic leg, with less marked trophic changes, was selected for endoscopic surgery. There are few publications on the use of endoscopic techniques to harvest the saphenous vein in vascular surgery, in contrast to the fairly frequent application in cardiac surgery [7]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%