2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.01.1965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer and Its Impact on Surgical Staging

Abstract: EUS-FNA qualifies as the initial staging procedure of choice for patients with (suspected) lung cancer and enlarged mediastinal LNs. Implementation of EUS-FNA in staging algorithms for lung cancer might reduce the number of surgical staging procedures considerably.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
86
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…If selection is done by CT scan on the basis of lymph node short-axis >1 cm, one may expect that on the average, larger lymph nodes will be explored than when PET scan is used. Indeed, in the largest study on the staging of CT enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes using oesophageal ultrasound with fine needle aspiration, the mean size of sampled lymph nodes was 24 mm [13]. Despite differences in lymph node size and the fact that the latter study used rapid on-site cytological examination, both this latter and the present studies showed similar sensitivities and specificities of ultrasound guided sampling in the context of similar prevalence of lymph node metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If selection is done by CT scan on the basis of lymph node short-axis >1 cm, one may expect that on the average, larger lymph nodes will be explored than when PET scan is used. Indeed, in the largest study on the staging of CT enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes using oesophageal ultrasound with fine needle aspiration, the mean size of sampled lymph nodes was 24 mm [13]. Despite differences in lymph node size and the fact that the latter study used rapid on-site cytological examination, both this latter and the present studies showed similar sensitivities and specificities of ultrasound guided sampling in the context of similar prevalence of lymph node metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated using the standard definitions, excluding patients in whom surgery was not undertaken to verify non contributive TBNA results. False-positive aspirations were considered unlikely and no surgical verification was then performed [13]. In fact, the main source of false positive result is likely to be a lung tumour abutting the main tracheo-bronchial tree but none of our patients showed this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration has been reported as an endoscopic option to evaluate the mediastinum [9][10][11][12]. Unfortunately, it does not allow for airway inspection during the procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dedicated ultrasound scanner, mounted on a side viewing videogastroscope enables tissue visualization at a radius of 2-10 cm around the esophagus. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA has been reported to range between 74 and 92 % [29][30][31]. Two recent meta-analyses, combining more than 1000 patients have determined the sensitivity to be closer to 83-84 % [5,25].…”
Section: Eus-fnamentioning
confidence: 99%