1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66180-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux with Collagen: Preliminary Report and Cost Analysis

Abstract: Endoscopic injection of collagen is effective treatment for vesicoureteral reflux. Furthermore, it causes minimal morbidity and may effect cost savings in health care management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, seven studies did not discuss the safety or tolerability of the treatment [11,13,33,35,36,44,45,50]. Among those six studies that did report some information on safety findings, the following was noted.…”
Section: Safety Of Endoscopic Injection In Duplex Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, seven studies did not discuss the safety or tolerability of the treatment [11,13,33,35,36,44,45,50]. Among those six studies that did report some information on safety findings, the following was noted.…”
Section: Safety Of Endoscopic Injection In Duplex Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of several studies suggest that Deflux is more cost effective than open surgery [29][30][31]. Kobelt et al used a mathematical model to suggest that medical costs decrease nearly 20% when open Deflux is used in place of ureteral reimplantation [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With two decades of experience and thousands of patients treated, it remains an option when counselling patients and parents on the need for surgery, given the appropriate indications. The advantage of STING is that it is minimally invasive, may be accomplished as an outpatient procedure with minimal morbidity, and is more cost effective than open surgery (43,44). However, this must be balanced against the fact that STING has lower cure rates than open surgery; necessitates, in most cases, the injection of a foreign material, with potential for adverse reaction; and has limited data regarding long term cure rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%