Endoscopic Superior Peroneal Retinaculum Reconstruction Using Q-FIX MINI Suture Anchor

Lui, Tun Hing; Li, Charles Churk Hang

doi:10.1016/j.eats.2022.11.001

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Last, it is challenging to address PTD caused by SPR avulsion fractures through arthroscopic procedures. Therefore, groove‐deepening procedures can increase the tendon sliding space and promote SPR healing 21 . During surgery, we closely observed the overall condition of the fibular ridge and groove.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Therefore, groove‐deepening procedures can increase the tendon sliding space and promote SPR healing. 21 During surgery, we closely observed the overall condition of the fibular ridge and groove. One specific method involves placing a probe parallel to the groove and proceeding with groove deepening when there is no significant curvature (Figure 7 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Arthroscopic and Open Surgery for Ogden Type 1–2 Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Wang,

Zheng,

Yang

et al. 2024

Orthopaedic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveWhile the incidence of peroneal tendon dislocation (PTD) is relatively low, it is frequently underdiagnosed in clinical practice, and the misdiagnosis or improper treatment of this condition may lead to a decline in patients' quality of life. Currently, the surgical treatment options for PTD mainly include open and arthroscopic surgery. However, in order to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of these two surgical approaches, further comparative research is needed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the early clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgery in the treatment of Ogden type 1–2 PTD.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive analysis of 46 patients diagnosed with PTD who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2017 and January 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: the open surgery group, consisting of 26 cases, and the arthroscopic surgery group, consisting of 20 cases. To compare the effectiveness of the surgical approach, we evaluated several parameters, including the integrity of the superior peroneal retinaculum on MRI images, functional scores, pain interference scores, and ankle eversion muscle strength. These assessments are conducted respectively before the surgery, 1 month after the surgery, 3 months after the surgery, and at the final follow‐up for each group of patients (at least 6 months post‐surgery). Demographics and intergroup comparisons of the two groups of data were analyzed by t‐test or the Mann–Whitney U test. Intragroup comparisons of the two groups of data were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by post hoc multiple comparisons.ResultsIn the intragroup comparisons, both the arthroscopic surgery and the open surgery group demonstrated significant improvement in functional scores, pain interference scores, muscle strength, and MRI findings at the final follow‐up postoperatively (p < 0.01). However, the open surgery group exhibited significant improvements in these outcomes at the final follow‐up, while the arthroscopic surgery group showed significant improvement at 3 months postoperatively. In intergroup comparisons, the arthroscopic surgery group outperformed the open surgery group in functional scores, pain interference scores, and muscle strength 3 months after the surgery, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.01).ConclusionArthroscopic surgery offers advantages in early clinical outcomes, such as pain relief, function, and muscle strength improvement. However, over time, both approaches provide similar results regarding effectiveness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Arthroscopic and Open Surgery for Ogden Type 1–2 Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Wang,

Zheng,

Yang

et al. 2024

Orthopaedic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to a 2015 review, groove deepening + SPR repair is the best treatment for peroneal tendon dislocation [19]. Reattaching the superior retinaculum is the most suitable technique when using an anatomical approach [17,[39][40][41][42].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Return to Sport after Surgical Treatment for Dislocation of the Peroneal Tendon: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the return to normal activities and sports after surgical management of peroneal tendon dislocation through different surgical techniques. Methods: This review included studies (retrospective case series, prospective cohort study) that analyzed different aspects: return to sport (RTS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), satisfaction, and redislocation episodes after surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review, analyzing 1699 articles. We researched our selected studies through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. The last search was performed in December 2022. We used the MINORS score to perform a quality assessment of pooled data. In total, 20 studies were included. Results: The postoperative AOFAS score, VAS scale, and high satisfaction percentages all improve with surgical therapy. At long-term follow-up, the redislocation following surgical treatment is minimal. Compared to patients who only receive superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) repair and other surgical procedures, patients with groove deepening and SPR repair have greater rates of returning to sports (bony and rerouting procedures). Conclusions: Peroneal tendon dislocation surgery offers good outcomes, a quick return to sport, and high patient satisfaction. Those who received both groove deepening and SPR repair as opposed to other surgical procedures have greater rates of returning to sports.

show abstract

Endoscopic Superior Peroneal Retinaculum Reconstruction Using Q-FIX MINI Suture Anchor

Cited by 2 publications

References 40 publications

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Arthroscopic and Open Surgery for Ogden Type 1–2 Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Arthroscopic and Open Surgery for Ogden Type 1–2 Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Return to Sport after Surgical Treatment for Dislocation of the Peroneal Tendon: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About