2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315634913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ending Obama's War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, nowhere in Resolution 1368 is an invasion legitimised. Therefore, the USA bypassed the Security Council and unilaterally initiated military strikes (Cortright, 2011: 13). Also, in efforts to authorise the use of force, the 107th Congress formed a joint resolution, called ‘Authorisation for Use of Military Force’ (AUMF), which legitimised the President to use ‘all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001’ (Congress, 2001).…”
Section: Just War Theory and War On Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, nowhere in Resolution 1368 is an invasion legitimised. Therefore, the USA bypassed the Security Council and unilaterally initiated military strikes (Cortright, 2011: 13). Also, in efforts to authorise the use of force, the 107th Congress formed a joint resolution, called ‘Authorisation for Use of Military Force’ (AUMF), which legitimised the President to use ‘all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001’ (Congress, 2001).…”
Section: Just War Theory and War On Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, there was also increasing support for imposing democracy on states in need of it, and President Bush embraced the notion of forceful democratisation to counter-terrorism in the Middle East (Downes & Monten, 2013: 95). However, as Cortright (2011: 11) suggests, ‘the Bush Administration never seriously considered an alternative to war in Afghanistan’. Instead of seeking reconciliation, the USA was driven by ideological motivations to pursue the War on Terror, as they favoured regime change in Afghanistan and as indicated, saw little hope and scope for co-operation with the existing dispensation.…”
Section: Just War Theory and War On Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations