Abstract:Family discussion of organ donation has been found to double rates of family consent regarding organ donation. Therefore, family discussion is an important communication process to study in the effort to get more people to become organ donors. This investigation concerns the willingness to communicate about organ donation and its relationship to other variables and processes related to family discussion of organ donation. Previous research on willingness to communicate examined the antecedent variables of know… Show more
“…19 Public education campaigns should continue to encourage people to become organ donors and to discuss this decision with all family members, including older children and adolescents. 20, 21 We also found that print media coverage of transplant success stories was an important and effective strategy for increasing awareness of the benefits of both organ donation and transplantation, especially in donor parents. Newspaper and magazine articles that stress how donated organs made the triumph of transplantation possible would seem to have a particularly positive impact.…”
Objective-To identify factors that influence parents' decisions when asked to donate a deceased child's organs.Design-Cross-sectional design with data collection via structured telephone interviews.Setting and Participants-Seventy-four parents (49 donors, 25 non-donors) of donor-eligible deceased children who were previously approached by coordinators from one organ procurement organization (OPO) in the southeastern USA.Main Results-Multivariate analyses showed that organ donation was more likely when the parent was a registered organ donor (OR=1.4, CI=1.1, 2.7), the parent had favorable organ donation beliefs (OR=5.5, CI=2.7, 12.3), the parent was exposed to organ donation information prior to the child's death (OR = 2.6, CI = 1.7, 10.3), a member of the child's healthcare team first mentioned organ donation (OR=1.4, CI=1.2, 3.7), the requestor was perceived as sensitive to the family's needs (OR=0.4, CI=0.2, 0.7), the family had sufficient time to discuss donation (OR=5.2, CI=1.4, 11.6), and family members were in agreement about donation (OR=2.8, CI=1.3, 5.2).Conclusions-This study identifies several modifiable variables that influence the donation decision-making process for parents. Strategies to facilitate targeted organ donation education and higher consent rates are discussed.
“…19 Public education campaigns should continue to encourage people to become organ donors and to discuss this decision with all family members, including older children and adolescents. 20, 21 We also found that print media coverage of transplant success stories was an important and effective strategy for increasing awareness of the benefits of both organ donation and transplantation, especially in donor parents. Newspaper and magazine articles that stress how donated organs made the triumph of transplantation possible would seem to have a particularly positive impact.…”
Objective-To identify factors that influence parents' decisions when asked to donate a deceased child's organs.Design-Cross-sectional design with data collection via structured telephone interviews.Setting and Participants-Seventy-four parents (49 donors, 25 non-donors) of donor-eligible deceased children who were previously approached by coordinators from one organ procurement organization (OPO) in the southeastern USA.Main Results-Multivariate analyses showed that organ donation was more likely when the parent was a registered organ donor (OR=1.4, CI=1.1, 2.7), the parent had favorable organ donation beliefs (OR=5.5, CI=2.7, 12.3), the parent was exposed to organ donation information prior to the child's death (OR = 2.6, CI = 1.7, 10.3), a member of the child's healthcare team first mentioned organ donation (OR=1.4, CI=1.2, 3.7), the requestor was perceived as sensitive to the family's needs (OR=0.4, CI=0.2, 0.7), the family had sufficient time to discuss donation (OR=5.2, CI=1.4, 11.6), and family members were in agreement about donation (OR=2.8, CI=1.3, 5.2).Conclusions-This study identifies several modifiable variables that influence the donation decision-making process for parents. Strategies to facilitate targeted organ donation education and higher consent rates are discussed.
“…Aynı çalışmada eğer ölen kişi gençse ve bağışı yapacak olan kişi anne-babası değil de, kardeşi ya da çocukları ise bağış izninin azaldığı saptanmıştır. Ölüm bir hastalık nedeniyle değil de bir şiddet olayı sonucu (intihar hariç) gerçekleşmişse ölen kişiye daha fazla acı çektirilmemesi düşüncesiyle yine bağış izninin azaldığı tespit edilmiştir (24).…”
Section: Türk Nefroloji Diyaliz Ve Transplantasyon Dergisi Turkish Neunclassified
“…Willingness to Communicate About Organ Donation Scale (developed by Morgan & Miller, 2002, extended by Smith et al, 2004). The scale measures the extent participants agree with statements related to discussing organ donation with other people on a seven-point scale (0 = Disagree Strongly; 6 = Agree Strongly).…”
Section: Willingness To Communicate About Organ Donation Participantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• I feel proud about my decision to donate • I would recommend the decision to become an organ donor to other people • I always want to be registered as an organ donor • I would not advise someone else to register as an organ donor (R) • I regret my decision to donate (R) • I feel very committed to my decision to become an organ donor Willingness to Communicate (Morgan & Miller, 2002;Smith et al, 2004) (0 = Disagree Strongly; 6 = Agree Strongly)…”
This study sought to expand current narrative persuasion models by examining the role of subtext processing. The extended elaboration likelihood model suggests that transportation leads to persuasion by reducing counterarguments to stories' persuasive subtexts. The model implicitly argues that transportation should reduce total subtext processing, including counterarguments and intended elaboration. But this study reasoned that people with stronger eudaimonic motivation to have meaningful entertainment experiences, would put more effort into processing stories' subtexts while engaging with the narrative. Because less eudaimonically motivated individuals may be at risk for missing the subtext, it was also expected that adding a supplemental conclusion scene that reiterates the intended message would facilitate persuasion.Following a pre-test survey, 201 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to view an episode of the crime drama Numb3rs: one of two versions of "Harvest," designed to promote organ donation (with or without a conclusion scene), or a control episode. After viewing, participants completed a thought-listing task and second survey.Results show that "Harvest" did not result in persuasive outcomes related to organ donation. Transportation was a marginally significant positive predictor of total subtext processing. Contrary to predictions, eudaimonic motivation negatively predicted amount of total subtext processing.Eudaimonic motivation also negatively (but marginally) predicted doctor mistrust, but this effect was moderated by conclusion condition: eudaimonic motivation was negatively associated with doctor mistrust only in the no conclusion condition. Eudaimonic motivation was also negatively (but marginally) associated with intended elaboration. Further examination showed that, compared to people with low eudaimonic motivation, those with high eudaimonic motivation were less likely to engage in intended elaboration, but only in the no conclusion condition. This pattern of findings provides indirect evidence that intended elaboration was responsible for decreasing doctor mistrust among people with high eudaimonic motivation who saw the conclusion. But surprisingly, intended elaboration was not directly related to any persuasive outcomes.The findings tentatively suggest that transportation and subtext processing can coexist and that eudaimonic motivation can affect the extent to which viewers engage in subtext processing during narrative engagement. The results also indicate that supplemental conclusions may be useful tools for narrative persuasion. Nobody has influenced my development as a scholar more than Cindy Hoffner. Her research and teaching inspired me, and her mentorship gave me the skills, professional socialization, and confidence to become an independent scholar. This dissertation is a direct product of her hours of dedication, her firm guidance, her unrelenting patience, and her unwavering faith in me. I hope that I one day have the opportunity to be half as good a mentor to ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.