Exploring Subtext Processing in Narrative Persuasion: The Role of Eudaimonic Entertainment-Use Motivation and a Supplemental Conclusion Scene

Abstract

This study sought to expand current narrative persuasion models by examining the role of subtext processing. The extended elaboration likelihood model suggests that transportation leads to persuasion by reducing counterarguments to stories' persuasive subtexts. The model implicitly argues that transportation should reduce total subtext processing, including counterarguments and intended elaboration. But this study reasoned that people with stronger eudaimonic motivation to have meaningful entertainment experiences, would put more effort into processing stories' subtexts while engaging with the narrative. Because less eudaimonically motivated individuals may be at risk for missing the subtext, it was also expected that adding a supplemental conclusion scene that reiterates the intended message would facilitate persuasion.Following a pre-test survey, 201 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to view an episode of the crime drama Numb3rs: one of two versions of "Harvest," designed to promote organ donation (with or without a conclusion scene), or a control episode. After viewing, participants completed a thought-listing task and second survey.Results show that "Harvest" did not result in persuasive outcomes related to organ donation. Transportation was a marginally significant positive predictor of total subtext processing. Contrary to predictions, eudaimonic motivation negatively predicted amount of total subtext processing.Eudaimonic motivation also negatively (but marginally) predicted doctor mistrust, but this effect was moderated by conclusion condition: eudaimonic motivation was negatively associated with doctor mistrust only in the no conclusion condition. Eudaimonic motivation was also negatively (but marginally) associated with intended elaboration. Further examination showed that, compared to people with low eudaimonic motivation, those with high eudaimonic motivation were less likely to engage in intended elaboration, but only in the no conclusion condition. This pattern of findings provides indirect evidence that intended elaboration was responsible for decreasing doctor mistrust among people with high eudaimonic motivation who saw the conclusion. But surprisingly, intended elaboration was not directly related to any persuasive outcomes.The findings tentatively suggest that transportation and subtext processing can coexist and that eudaimonic motivation can affect the extent to which viewers engage in subtext processing during narrative engagement. The results also indicate that supplemental conclusions may be useful tools for narrative persuasion. Nobody has influenced my development as a scholar more than Cindy Hoffner. Her research and teaching inspired me, and her mentorship gave me the skills, professional socialization, and confidence to become an independent scholar. This dissertation is a direct product of her hours of dedication, her firm guidance, her unrelenting patience, and her unwavering faith in me. I hope that I one day have the opportunity to be half as good a mentor to ...

Strategic Storytelling: When Narratives Help Versus Hurt the Persuasive Power of Facts

“…Finally, even when one has strong facts, other properties of stories might make them attractive despite the potential to reduce persuasion. For example, stories can use subtext or underlying themes to influence attitudes without the awareness of the audience (E. L. Cohen, 2016).…”

Seeing is believing: The role of imagery fluency in narrative persuasion through a graphic novel.

“…The persuasive power of graphic novels and other visual mediums could be rooted in their ability to improve imagery fluency which elicits stronger emotional responses. Another possibility is that rather than simply reducing individuals’ resistance to persuasion, visual fluency frees up cognitive resources so as to promote intended, supportive elaboration on the story’s arguments (Cohen, 2016; Niederdeppe, Kim, Lundell, Fazili, & Frazier, 2012). Both possibilities are fruitful areas for additional research.…”

Engagement with body image health promotion videos in adult men and women: differences between narrative, informational, and persuasive appeal approaches

“…Persuasive health messages may also contain persuasive appeals, which are intended to clarify the content and meaning of narrative communication [ 11 , 18 , 39 ]. For instance, an episode of a television program about drink driving contained a message explicitly explaining the danger of binge drinking and drink driving to serve as a clarification of a narrative that depicted an incident of drink driving [ 18 ].…”