Encapsulated MWCNT@MOF-derived In2S3 tubular heterostructures for boosted visible-light-driven degradation of tetracycline

Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Coupled with Production of Highly Value‐Added Organic Chemicals by a Composite Photocatalyst CdIn2S4@MIL‐53‐SO3Ni1/2

“…As shown in Scheme 1, CIS was synthesized by liquid phase sulfidation of MOF MIL-68 and subsequent partial cation exchange with Cd II ions. [28][29][30] Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern shows that the sharp diffraction peaks of as-synthesized MIL-68 match well with those of calculated one (Figure S1). In 2 S 3 exhibits broad PXRD peaks at 2θ = 27.3 and 48.0°that are ascribed to the characteristic (3 1 1) and (4 4 0) facets, respectively (Figure 1).…”

“…As shown in Scheme 1, CIS was synthesized by liquid phase sulfidation of MOF MIL‐68 and subsequent partial cation exchange with Cd II ions [28–30] . Powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern shows that the sharp diffraction peaks of as‐synthesized MIL‐68 match well with those of calculated one (Figure S1).…”

Construction of Hierarchical BiOI/MoS2/CdS Heterostructured Microspheres for Boosting Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Under Visible Light

“…[ 57 ] Therefore, the VB values and CB edge potentials of BiOI, MoS 2 , and CdS could be evaluated according to the following equations. [ 57,58 ] where E vs,NHE , E vs,Ag/AgCl , E VB , and E CB refer to the standard band potential, the flat potential, the valence band edge potential, and CB edge potential, respectively. [ 42,58 ] As a result, the E VB for BiOI, MoS 2 , and CdS can be calculated to be 1.38, 1.58, and 1.3 eV, respectively.…”

Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photo/Electrocatalysis

“…As shown in Figure A, Pi et al presented a fabrication of MWCNT@MOF‐derived In 2 S 3 hollow‐tube heterostructure by general MOF sulfidation. [ 112 ] The obtained 0.3%‐MWCNT@MOF‐derived In 2 S 3 exhibited an outstanding photocatalytic activity for TC degradation under visible light, which achieved almost 100% degradation efficiency and high apparent reaction rate constants (3–5 times higher than traditional In 2 S 3 bulk and pure MOF‐derived hollow In 2 S 3 ) (Figure 12B–D). Later, Hussain et al reported a porous carbon matrix photocatalyst embedded with crystalline ZnO NPs via carbonizing MOF‐5 at different temperatures and atmospheres (Figure 12E).…”