Background: EMD has been considered to exert positive effects on wound healing, postoperative discomfort, and bone regeneration. Purpose: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to investigate and compare (a) horizontal and vertical bone dimensional changes, (b) early postoperative discomfort and soft tissue wound healing outcomes, and (c) treatment modalities for implant placement, following posterior maxillary alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with and without adjunctive use of EMD. Methods: Twenty-eight participants were randomly assigned to three groups: extraction sockets filled with bovine bone mineral and membrane with EMD (test group 1, n = 10) and without EMD (test group 2, n = 10) and spontaneous healing (control group, n = 8). Alveolar bone dimensional changes were measured using cone-beam computed tomography 5 months after ARP, and postoperative pain and wound healing outcomes were also evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in horizontal or vertical bone dimensional changes between test groups 1 (horizontal width changes at 1 mm apically below the alveolar ridge crest [HW]: −1.44 ± 0.54 mm) and 2 (HW: −1.42 ± 0.26 mm), but the changes at HW (−2.36 ± 1.03 mm) in the control group were significantly greater than those in test groups 1 and 2 (P < .05). Early postoperative discomfort and soft tissue wound healing outcomes were not significantly different between the two test groups. Furthermore, unlike the control group, both the test groups 1 and 2 were implanted without sinus floor elevation using the lateral approach. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, EMD failed to provide additional benefits in ARP in the posterior maxilla. K E Y W O R D S alveolar process, enamel matrix derivatives, randomized controlled trial, wound healing 1 | INTRODUCTION Alveolar bone resorption is mainly caused by both local inflammatory response after periodontal infection and the physiologic process of disuse atrophy. 1 In particular, the maxillary posterior region has relatively low bone density and is anatomically contiguous with the maxillary sinus; therefore, increased alveolar bone loss and pneumatization after tooth extraction are possible in this region. 1,2 Therefore, it is