Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3051457.3051471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling Real-Time Adaptivity in MOOCs with a Personalized Next-Step Recommendation Framework

Abstract: In this paper, we demonstrate a first-of-its-kind adaptive intervention in a MOOC utilizing real-time clickstream data and a novel machine learned model of behavior. We detail how we augmented the edX platform with the capabilities necessary to support this type of intervention which required both tracking learners' behaviors in real-time and dynamically adapting content based on each learner's individual clickstream history. Our chosen pilot intervention was in the category of adaptive pathways and courseware… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kotsiantis et al (2003) describes a predictive model-based support tool for a distance learning degree program of 354 students, a scale far smaller than most MOOCs. The work which most clearly demonstrates adaptive content and learner pathways of which the authors are aware is Pardos et al (2017), which implements a real-time adaptive content model in an edX MOOC. However, this implementation is optimized for time-on-page, not student learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kotsiantis et al (2003) describes a predictive model-based support tool for a distance learning degree program of 354 students, a scale far smaller than most MOOCs. The work which most clearly demonstrates adaptive content and learner pathways of which the authors are aware is Pardos et al (2017), which implements a real-time adaptive content model in an edX MOOC. However, this implementation is optimized for time-on-page, not student learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few studies have combined predictive modeling with real-world interventions in a MOOC. In [20], next resource suggestions were made using a predictive model of behavior [19]. On residential campuses, predictive models of drop-out have been operationalized in the form of dispatching counselors for flagged students [18], an approach which can have unintended side effects of signaling to students that they are not likely to pass the course, and thus catalyzing a greater rate of drop-out than without the intervention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Predictive Modeling: A critical area of MOOC research to date has been the construction and analysis of predictive models of student success [8]. Such models have the potential to drive personalized learner supports or platform modalities [32], adaptive learning pathways [33], contribute to learning theory or support data understanding (such as about demographic differences in dropout or achievement) [4], or "early warning" systems designed to alert instructors of struggling students.…”
Section: Replication and Analysis Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%