The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication at Scale in a MOOC Using Predictive Engagement Analytics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Big data are also used to understand the effectiveness of administrative decisions and educational interventions. Big data models can predict when actions need to be taken for students, such as identifying when students are disengaging from online courses (Le et al, 2018). For instance, Whitehill et al (2015) analyzed more than 2 million data points generated by more than 200,000 students taking 10 MOOC courses from HarvardX to develop detectors of whether a student would stop course work.…”
Section: Microlevel Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Big data are also used to understand the effectiveness of administrative decisions and educational interventions. Big data models can predict when actions need to be taken for students, such as identifying when students are disengaging from online courses (Le et al, 2018). For instance, Whitehill et al (2015) analyzed more than 2 million data points generated by more than 200,000 students taking 10 MOOC courses from HarvardX to develop detectors of whether a student would stop course work.…”
Section: Microlevel Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a more general perspective, DeepLMS aligns with the previous efforts that incorporate LSTM-based predictions in the context of online education, yet not at the exact same specific problem settings as in DeepLMS. Hence, the latter is well-positioned with the approaches related to: i) cross-domains analysis, e.g., MOOCs impact in different contexts 57 , as DeepLMS could be easily adapted to a micro analysis of the QoI per discipline/course and transfer learning from one discipline to another at the same course (or courses with comparable content), as shown here with the application of DeepLMS to DB1-DB3, in a similar manner that was applied in MOOCs from different domains 57 ; ii) combination of learning patterns in the context domain with the temporal nature of the clickstream data 58 , and identification of students at risk 59 , as DeepLMS could be combined with an autoencoder to capture both the underlying behavioral patterns and the temporal nature of the interaction data at various levels of the predicted QoI (e.g., low (<0.5) QoI (at risk level)); iii) predicting learning gains by incorporating skills discovery 60,61 , as DeepLMS could provide the predicted QoI as an additional source of the user profile to his/her skills and learning gains; iv) user learning states and learning activities prediction from wearable devices 62 , as DeepLMS could easily be embedded in the expanded space of affective (a-) learning, and inform a more extended predictive model that would incorporate the learning state with the estimated QoI; v) increasing the communication of the instructional staff to learners based on individual predictions of their engagement during MOOCs 63,64 , as DeepLMS could facilitate the coordination of the instructor with the learner based on the informed predicted QoI; and vi) predicting the learning paths/performance 65 and the teaching paths 66 , as the DeepLMS could be extended in the context of affecting the learning/teaching path by the predicted QoI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these data streams, a wide range of higher level features can be inferred including affect, attention, cognitive processing, stress and fatigue. Thus, MMLA may be applicable in a wide range of educational contexts including face-to-face interactions without technological aids (Di Mitri et al, 2017;Pijeira-Díaz, Drachsler, Kirschner, & Järvelä, 2018;Spikol et al, 2018), face-to-face technology enhanced learning (Liu et al, 2016;Viswanathan & VanLehn, 2017b) and online learning (Le, Pardos, Meyer, & Thorp, 2018). Within MMLA, many different combinations of data streams have been explored but it is not clear what makes the different combinations impactful for collaborative learning.…”
Section: Practitioner Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using LSTMs with outcome data, they can be used to find successful and unsuccessful strategies (Akram et al, 2018), predict the quality of a presentation (Li, Wong, & Kankanhalli, 2016) or predict learning outcomes (Okubo, Yamashita, Shimada, & Ogata, 2017). LSTMs can more accurately predict learning than common methods like Bayesian knowledge tracing (Piech et al, 2015) On the other hand, they have also been used to provide interventions during the learning process by providing learning recommendations (Zhou, Huang, Hu, Zhu, & Tang, 2018), predicting engagement and affect (Botelho, Baker, & Heffernan, 2017;Le et al, 2018), collaboration actions (Shibata, Ando, & Inaba, 2017), learning state (Wang, Sy, Liu, & Piech, 2017) and forum post relationships (Wei, Lin, Yang, & Yu, 2017). The longer history afforded through the use of LSTMs provides a way for the predictions to consider temporal patterns.…”
Section: Temporal Analysis In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%