2018
DOI: 10.1080/1463922x.2018.1485984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling multitasking by designing for situation awareness within the vehicle environment

Abstract: In the driving environment, competition exists between Driving Related Activities (DRAs) and Non-Driving Related Activities (NDRAs). This is a source of inattention and human error. Continual proliferation of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) presents drivers with opportunities for distraction. Drivers simultaneously manage DRAs alongside unrelated but cognitively demanding NDRAs. Vehicle designers need ways of understanding human capability in such situations to provide solutions that accommodate these co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constrained Design and Vehicle Automation have a role to play but ultimately neither is addressing effectively the crucial problem of distraction on the roadway. The theoretical approach described in (Skrypchuk et al, 2019) and the experimental evidence presented in this paper, outline the potential for SA-based Unconstrained Design to enhance performance in an automotive multitasking situation. This may lead to IVIS design that can support a driver to multitask in the vehicle in a safe and efficient manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constrained Design and Vehicle Automation have a role to play but ultimately neither is addressing effectively the crucial problem of distraction on the roadway. The theoretical approach described in (Skrypchuk et al, 2019) and the experimental evidence presented in this paper, outline the potential for SA-based Unconstrained Design to enhance performance in an automotive multitasking situation. This may lead to IVIS design that can support a driver to multitask in the vehicle in a safe and efficient manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The potential incentive for the vehicle manufacturer is increased customer satisfaction while reducing the impact of the Fear of Missing Out. This paper builds upon the theoretical approach taken in (Skrypchuk et al, 2019) to develop and evaluate IVIS that aim to improve task performance during an in-vehicle multitasking situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaber & Endsley, 1997) have been widely discussed as important concepts for transitions between automation modes (see, for example, de Winter, Happee, Martens, & Stanton, 2014; Merat et al, 2019 for overviews). Skrypchuk, Langdon, Sawyer, Mouzakitis, and Clarkson (2018) summarize that to regain SA in a vehicle environment the driver has to know “where and when to focus attention from moment to moment” (p. 111). The authors further suggest that based on the information available to a driver (e.g., from driving experience, alarms, visual cues), the driver will decide which aspects of the driving environment to attend to.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in complex situations where drivers cannot fall back on learned schemata, lower priority subtasks for driving may be neglected (cf. Skrypchuk et al, 2018). During a transition from an automated mode back to manual control, an operator needs to prioritize subtasks to reallocate attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation