2018
DOI: 10.5951/mathteaceduc.6.2.0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

En/countering Inclusive Mathematics Education: A Case of Professional Learning

Abstract: Despite the push for inclusive mathematics education, students with disabilities continue to lack access to, and achievement in, rich mathematics learning opportunities. We assert that mathematics teacher educators have a central role in addressing these contradictions. This role includes enacting facilitative moves during mathematics teacher professional learning to encounter and counter social forces, which we denote in this article as en/counters. As part of a larger study, we explored the extent to which t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the professional learning community I convened as part of the aforementioned study (see also Tan & Thorius, 2018a, 2018b, we focused on inclusive mathematics education for students with disabilities and where many students were of color and educated in self-contained classroom settings. Educators described their cognitive figuring of themselves as patient and expert helpers on the basis of their knowledge of the relationship between students' disability labels and skill-deficits.…”
Section: Facilitating En/counters With White Supremacy and Ableism In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the professional learning community I convened as part of the aforementioned study (see also Tan & Thorius, 2018a, 2018b, we focused on inclusive mathematics education for students with disabilities and where many students were of color and educated in self-contained classroom settings. Educators described their cognitive figuring of themselves as patient and expert helpers on the basis of their knowledge of the relationship between students' disability labels and skill-deficits.…”
Section: Facilitating En/counters With White Supremacy and Ableism In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this essay, I reflect on how the presence of a TA practitioner who possesses intersectional minoritized social identities is in a unique position to introduce tension in the TA activity system, disrupt marginalizing dominant narratives about difference, and affect educators' development of inclusive ideas about difference (Engeström, 2011;Tan & Thorius, 2018). As a Black woman with a dis/ability, I discuss the socio-historical context in which I experienced public K-12 education to consider how these experiences inform my current interactions within the TA experience.…”
Section: Situating My Positionality As a Black Woman With A Dis/abilimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other instances, micro-aggressions manifest in different ways such as when educators approach a White or non-disabled subordinate staff member on my team with questions rather than seeking support from me, signaling their questioning of my expertise or the legitimacy of my role. treatment of difference I experience as a TA practitioner, which connect to my own educational history as a Black woman with a dis/ability, along with equity-expansive (Tan & Thorius, 2018) (re)mediating (i.e. countering) moves I use to disrupt these impacts.…”
Section: Intersecting Identities Were Not Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, professional learning with a focus on equity is an important component to address systemic inequities (Waitoller & Artiles, 2013). Teachers with opportunities to engage in equity-oriented professional learning opportunities are more likely to hold beliefs of high-quality mathematics education (Clark et al, 2014) and attune to problematic practices involving students with dis/abilities (Tan & Thorius, 2018). Yet research on this area of equity-oriented teacher education remains sparse (Lambert & Tan, 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%