2019
DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2019.1576945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating en/counters with special education’s cloak of benevolence in professional learning to eliminate racial disproportionality in special education

Abstract: Despite the U.S. government's funding and provision of technical assistance as a prevailing approach to remedy special education racial disproportionality, and considerable research on the explanations, causes, and frameworks for addressing the phenomenon, there is little documentation of research or technical assistance efforts for actually doing so. As a white, nondisabled professor and executive director of a federally funded Equity Assistance Center, I theorize and offer for critique ways I have facilitate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These actions are harmful. They decontextualize the cultural-historical contexts of not only race-relations, but dis/Ability-relations inside and around schools (Hernández-Saca & Cannon, 2019;Thorius, 2019) and the power of IDEA to further act as a tool of exclusion (Ferri & Connor, 2005). In other words, policy is not a neutral vehicle, but rather is ideologically and value driven (Linton, 1998;Purpel & McLaurin, 2004).…”
Section: A Case In Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These actions are harmful. They decontextualize the cultural-historical contexts of not only race-relations, but dis/Ability-relations inside and around schools (Hernández-Saca & Cannon, 2019;Thorius, 2019) and the power of IDEA to further act as a tool of exclusion (Ferri & Connor, 2005). In other words, policy is not a neutral vehicle, but rather is ideologically and value driven (Linton, 1998;Purpel & McLaurin, 2004).…”
Section: A Case In Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%