2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empty follicle syndrome: the reality of a controversial syndrome, a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
105
5
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
105
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review reported that 67% of cases were so called false empty follicle syndrome mainly related to human error or pharmacological problems. 2 Two classes of EFS can be differentiated by hormone levels on the day of ovum pick up. In genuine EFS the level of either HCG, LH or progesterone are concordant with the correct administration of triggering drug while false EFS the levels are low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A systematic review reported that 67% of cases were so called false empty follicle syndrome mainly related to human error or pharmacological problems. 2 Two classes of EFS can be differentiated by hormone levels on the day of ovum pick up. In genuine EFS the level of either HCG, LH or progesterone are concordant with the correct administration of triggering drug while false EFS the levels are low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When hcg was used as triggering agent different studies suggest that minimum serum β hcg concentration ranges from 5 to 161 IU/l. 2,5 In case of ovulation trigger with GnRH agonist, no cut off levels of LH or progesterone on the day of ovum pick up has been proposed. In contrast to hCG triggering, the action of GnRHa trigger is indirect via the endogenous release of LH and FSH from the pituitary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations