Employment After Parenthood: Women of Migrant Origin and Natives Compared

Abstract

Motherhood negatively affects female employment in majority populations across Europe. Although employment levels are particularly low among women of migrant origin, little is known about the motherhood-employment link in migrant populations. This paper investigates whether family formation differentially affects the labour market position of migrant women and their descendants compared to natives. Using longitudinal microdata from the Belgian social security registers, 12,167 women are followed from 12 months before until 48 months after the birth of their first child for the period 1999-2010. Levels of activity (versus inactivity), employment (versus unemployment) and full-time employment (versus part-time employment) are compared between natives and first-and second-generation women of Southern European, Eastern European, Turkish and Moroccan origin. We find that activity and employment levels decrease to a larger extent following the transition to parenthood among women of migrant origin than among natives. With respect to activity levels, differences between second-generation women and natives are largely explained by socio-demographic and pre-birth job characteristics, while differences between first-generation women and natives are not, suggesting that other factors such as tied migration patterns determine labour market attachment among first-generation mothers. With respect to employment levels, unemployment is increasing more among women of migrant origin of both generations than among natives, also when controlling for background Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

National Family Policies and Mothers’ Employment: How Earnings Inequality Shapes Policy Effects across and within Countries

“…Another important avenue for future research is to consider other aspects of mothers’ social location. Although educational attainment dominates cross-national studies of women’s employment, single-country studies document differences in maternal employment and family policy uptake by race, ethnicity, and nativity (Kil et al 2018; Kil, Wood, and Neels 2018; Lu, Wang, and Han 2017; Vidal-Coso 2019). Given the challenges inherent in incorporating country-specific patterns and meanings of race, ethnicity, and nativity in a cross-national design, most work in this area is in the form of single-country studies or two-country comparisons (Pettit and Hook 2009).…”

Parental leave uptake among migrant and native mothers: Can precarious employment trajectories account for the difference?

“…The rising popularity of such policies, in combination with increased maternal employment and the changing relation between female labour force participation and fertility (Ahn and Mira, 2002) suggests that family policies meet the needs of a growing number of dual earner couples. Although labour force participation among mothers in majority populations has increased in recent decades, maternal employment levels (Bevelander and Groeneveld, 2012; Holland and de Valk, 2013; Kil et al., 2015a, 2017; Rubin et al., 2008) as well as uptake of family policies (Kil et al., 2016; Lapuerta et al., 2011; Merens et al., 2006; Neels and Wood, 2016) remain low in migrant populations across Europe. This contrast between native and migrant groups raises questions on the determinants of migrants’ uptake of family policies.…”

Non‐take up of the supplemental child benefit for children with a disability in Belgium: A mixed‐method approach

“…This suggests that parents with a migration background are more likely to apply for cash benefits and less likely to apply for care services or support. Although there is some evidence that non‐EU migrants in Belgium are more likely to provide home care for their children (Kil, Neels, Wood, & de Valk, ), at this point it remains an open question how the underrepresentation of disabled children from a migrant background at the Flemish level can be explained.…”