2020
DOI: 10.1177/0003122420922505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Family Policies and Mothers’ Employment: How Earnings Inequality Shapes Policy Effects across and within Countries

Abstract: Although researchers generally agree that national family policies play a role in shaping mothers’ employment, there is considerable debate about whether, how, and why policy effects vary across country contexts and within countries by mothers’ educational attainment. We hypothesize that family policies interact with national levels of earnings inequality to differentially affect mothers’ employment outcomes by educational attainment. We develop hypotheses about the two most commonly studied family policies—ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outside the United States, these pol i cies include paren tal leave months reserved for fathers and work hour reg u la tions that limit over work (Gornick and Meyers 2003;Rege and Solli 2013). Policies such as uni ver sal paid paren tal leave or childcare could also help reduce inequal ity by supporting con ti nu ity in women's earn ings in lower-and mid dle-income house holds (Hook and Paek 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside the United States, these pol i cies include paren tal leave months reserved for fathers and work hour reg u la tions that limit over work (Gornick and Meyers 2003;Rege and Solli 2013). Policies such as uni ver sal paid paren tal leave or childcare could also help reduce inequal ity by supporting con ti nu ity in women's earn ings in lower-and mid dle-income house holds (Hook and Paek 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) WLFP shows the percent of women in employment in our analysis sample of women age 16 to 60 in heterosexual unions. We decided to calculate this measure using our sample instead of using widely available women’s employment rates because the latter does not effectively capture how women’s employment sensitivity to family status and life-course junctures systematically varies across countries (Boeckmann, Misra, and Budig 2015; Hook and Paek 2020; Musick, Bea, and Gonalons-Pons 2020). (5) GWG is the difference between men’s average wage and women’s average wage as percent of men’s average wage.…”
Section: Data Measures and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across all social origin groups, men and women with professional degrees earn the highest salaries. In line with relative education theory (Horowitz, 2020), advanced degrees, being relatively rarer, do provide an advantage for everybody who earns them compared to more widespread types of degrees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%