2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.14.22271847
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employer Requirements and COVID-19 Vaccination and Attitudes among Healthcare Personnel in the U.S.: Findings from National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module, August – September 2021

Abstract: Introduction Employer vaccination requirements have been used to increase vaccination uptake among healthcare personnel (HCP). In summer 2021, HCP were the group most likely to have employer requirements for COVID-19 vaccinations as healthcare facilities led the implementation of such requirements. This study examined the association between employer requirements and HCP COVID-19 vaccination status and attitudes about the vaccine. Methods Participants were a national representative sample of United States (U… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we restrict the interpretation of these by frontline workers identified in this study and elsewhere (Henneberger et al, 2022;Prince et al, 2022) could be attributed to limited access to COVID-19 vaccines among non-healthcare frontline workers, and could be addressed, in part, by increasing workplace flexibilities to receive a vaccination, as reported in an assessment of non-healthcare frontline workplaces in Chicago (Lendacki et al, 2023). Among the items assessed at follow-up, vaccination requirements had a strong association with vaccine initiation, consistent with another nationally-representative survey (Lee et al, 2022). Given this finding, equitable, clearly communicated vaccine requirement policies could provide an opportunity to increase vaccine initiation (Mello et al, 2020) particularly among health care workers (Emanuel & Skorton, 2021).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, we restrict the interpretation of these by frontline workers identified in this study and elsewhere (Henneberger et al, 2022;Prince et al, 2022) could be attributed to limited access to COVID-19 vaccines among non-healthcare frontline workers, and could be addressed, in part, by increasing workplace flexibilities to receive a vaccination, as reported in an assessment of non-healthcare frontline workplaces in Chicago (Lendacki et al, 2023). Among the items assessed at follow-up, vaccination requirements had a strong association with vaccine initiation, consistent with another nationally-representative survey (Lee et al, 2022). Given this finding, equitable, clearly communicated vaccine requirement policies could provide an opportunity to increase vaccine initiation (Mello et al, 2020) particularly among health care workers (Emanuel & Skorton, 2021).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the United States, James Lee, an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, led a national phone survey of 12,875 health-care professionals who self-reported their vaccination status and the presence or absence of a workplace mandate 5 . Where mandates existed, 90.5% of respondents were vaccinated; where they did not, only 73.3% were.…”
Section: No Jab No Jobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the controversies, there is only limited empirical evidence on the actual impacts of requiring Covid-19 vaccination as a condition of employment. 3 Cohn et al (2022) report that employer-based vaccine mandates in New York City were associated with a significant increase in uptake and this finding is supported by survey evidence of hypothetical responses to mandates (Lee et al, 2021;Bennet, Bloom and Ferranna, 2022;Fishman et al, 2022). Evidence on real-world impacts for care homes is limited to a case study of a single US nursing home (Ritter et al, 2021) and descriptive data from Mississippi (Syme, Gouskova and Berry, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%