1986
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1986.4282625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
484
1
28

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,030 publications
(551 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
23
484
1
28
Order By: Relevance
“…A long tradition of research has shown that, in addition to the perceptions and characteristics of individual employees, the overall conditions of workplaces and job sites significantly affect the attachment of employees to the organization (e.g., Cotton & Tuttle, 1986;Griffeth, Hom, & Gaertner, 2000;Halaby & Weakliem, 1989;Hom & Griffeth, 1995;Kalleberg & Mastekaasa, 1998;Mobley, 1982;Mueller & Price, 1990;Price, 1977). This premise also shaped the methodology we used.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long tradition of research has shown that, in addition to the perceptions and characteristics of individual employees, the overall conditions of workplaces and job sites significantly affect the attachment of employees to the organization (e.g., Cotton & Tuttle, 1986;Griffeth, Hom, & Gaertner, 2000;Halaby & Weakliem, 1989;Hom & Griffeth, 1995;Kalleberg & Mastekaasa, 1998;Mobley, 1982;Mueller & Price, 1990;Price, 1977). This premise also shaped the methodology we used.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the most considerable influence so far has been the loss motivation model by Price & Mueller (1977, 2000) [13,14]. On the one hand, these theoretical models and studies indicated that turnover intention was the principal cognitive precursor of turnover behavior with greatly explanatory power [15,16]. On the other hand, turnover intention could also better reflect the real level of organization management compared with turnover behavior, which is easily affected by external factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet understanding the impact of NCLB on teachers is keenly important, not only because teachers are a main stakeholder group in education policy but also because teacher attitudes and perceptions of the work environment have been linked empirically to policy-relevant outcomes, such as teacher turnover (Allensworth, Ponisciak, & Mazzeo, 2009;Grissom, 2012;Ingersoll, 2001;Ladd, 2011;Loeb, Darling-Hammond, & Luczak, 2005). The importance of work attitudes as an appropriate outcome for study is reinforced by voluminous research from other fields connecting work attitudes not only to employee retention but also to such job outcomes as performance, lateness, and absenteeism (e.g., Cotton & Tuttle, 1986;Currivan, 2000;Harrison, Newman, & Roth, 2006;Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton, 2001;Tett & Meyer, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%