2004
DOI: 10.1080/1351847032000137447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee stock option plans and stock market reaction: evidence from Finland

Abstract: This paper examines whether the adoption of stock option plans results in changes in shareholders' wealth, and whether the stock market reactions to ESOP announcements could be explained by the target group of ESOP and the dilution effect. Short-horizon test methods are applied for this purpose. The sample consists of ESOP announcements of Finnish publicly quoted companies on the Helsinki Stock Exchange during the time period 1988-1998. The event study results show a slightly positive market reaction to announ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Galai and Schneller (1978) describe the positive effect from the ''potential inflow of cash due to exercising of warrants'' and the negative stock dilution effect. Ikaheimo et al (2004), find a mean dilutive stock price effect of 3.66% for 90 companies in Finland.…”
Section: Stock Options/warrantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Galai and Schneller (1978) describe the positive effect from the ''potential inflow of cash due to exercising of warrants'' and the negative stock dilution effect. Ikaheimo et al (2004), find a mean dilutive stock price effect of 3.66% for 90 companies in Finland.…”
Section: Stock Options/warrantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We did not correct this approximation with the dilution effect of warrants, since the exercise of the option can be assumed to be anticipated by the market and the dilution is already reflected in the share price at the time ESOs are adopted (Schulz and Trautmann, 1994;Ikäheimo et al, 2004). The dilution of each ESO varies between 0.0% (Perlos 1998) and 9.6% (TietoEnator 1996).…”
Section: Price Differential Between the Bands Model And Market Valuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… The resulting data are described in Ikäheimo et al (2004). We are grateful to Professor Ikäheimo for giving us access to these data. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%