2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee satisfaction and stock returns during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this is one of few studies that has attempted to explore the importance of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the various job aspects on the overall employee experiences during the pandemic. Though previous studies have examined various employee variables during the pandemic, such as employee engagement (Chanana and Sangeeta, 2021), employee satisfaction (Becker et al ., 2022), etc., the overall employee experience is less explored. Second, most of the prior research on employee experience have predominantly employed survey questionnaire method to collect the data; some of the studies have adopted qualitative method to study the employee experience (Prajapati and Pandey, 2020; Neill and Bowen, 2020; Qin and Men, 2022; Shambi, 2021; Yüksel, 2017; Zacher and Rudolph, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this is one of few studies that has attempted to explore the importance of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the various job aspects on the overall employee experiences during the pandemic. Though previous studies have examined various employee variables during the pandemic, such as employee engagement (Chanana and Sangeeta, 2021), employee satisfaction (Becker et al ., 2022), etc., the overall employee experience is less explored. Second, most of the prior research on employee experience have predominantly employed survey questionnaire method to collect the data; some of the studies have adopted qualitative method to study the employee experience (Prajapati and Pandey, 2020; Neill and Bowen, 2020; Qin and Men, 2022; Shambi, 2021; Yüksel, 2017; Zacher and Rudolph, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a dataset of 408 US firms from 2002 to 2011, Barnett et al (2018) found that companies with greater corporate responsibility ratings (CSR) were less likely to experience litigation. Other studies identified positive abnormal for firms with high employee satisfaction (Becker et al, 2022; Edmans et al, 2014; Fauver et al, 2018), customer loyalty (Albuquerque et al, 2019; Luo & Bhattacharya, 2009), and social capital and trust (Fiordelisi et al, 2022; Lins et al, 2017). Another strand of studies finds that the implementation of environmentally virtuous practices yields more favorable access to finance (Cheng et al, 2014; Liu et al, 2021; Maaloul, 2018) and generates a lower cost of debt financing (Caragnano et al, 2020; Jung et al, 2018; Pizzutilo et al, 2020) and cost of capital (Mariani et al, 2021; Sharfman & Fernando, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a dataset of 408 US firms from 2002 to 2011, Barnett et al (2018) found that companies with greater corporate responsibility ratings (CSR) were less likely to experience litigation. Other studies identified positive abnormal for firms with high employee satisfaction (Becker et al, 2022;Edmans et al, 2014;Fauver et al, 2018), customer loyalty (Albuquerque et al, 2019;Luo & Bhattacharya, 2009), and social capital and trust (Fiordelisi et al, 2022;Lins et al, 2017).…”
Section: Social Responsibility and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%