2008
DOI: 10.1177/239700220802200202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee Participation in Organizational Change: Investigating the Effects of Proactive vs. Reactive Implementation of Downsizing in Swedish Hospitals

Abstract: Whereas employee participation is generally conceived to facilitate implementation of organizational change, only limited research has investigated whether it may reduce the negative effects of downsizing. The present study compares two Swedish hospitals that implemented downsizing in different ways. While there were no major differences in stressors between hospitals, proactive implementation was associated with more employee participation. Moreover, employee participation variables were positively associated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During organisational restructurings employees often feel helpless and insecure. In order to reduce post-restructuring insecurity, employers should try to involve employees in decision making processes (Sverke, Hellgren, Näswall, Göransson, & Öhrming, 2008) especially when changes affect valued aspects of an employee's job.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During organisational restructurings employees often feel helpless and insecure. In order to reduce post-restructuring insecurity, employers should try to involve employees in decision making processes (Sverke, Hellgren, Näswall, Göransson, & Öhrming, 2008) especially when changes affect valued aspects of an employee's job.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, participation has been defined as employees' participation in problem-solving and decision-making in the organization (Lines 2005;Bess et al 2011). However, in this study, participation manifested itself as a more multifaceted phenomenon than what has emerged in previous studies such as López et al (2006), Bess et al (2011), Sverke et al (2008, and Lines (2005). In this study, employee participation in the change was delineated by connections between organizational and individual levels, namely, i) structures and practices facilitating employee participation, provided by the organization, and ii) nature of participation within these structures and practices, chosen by individual employees.…”
Section: Conclusion: Learning Opportunities Provided By Participatiomentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Easterby-Smith et al 2000;Lines 2005;Sverke et al 2008) have indicated that employee participation is one of the major explanations of successful organizational change. Employee participation has been viewed as enhancing learning, since it gathers together employees who have different kinds of experience, skills, and knowledge (Kitzmiller et al 2010).…”
Section: Learning Within Organizational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, same research has explored moderators ofthe participation~ctutcolne links (Holman et al, 2009;Jimmieson et at;Lines, 2004;Sagie & ICos1o'ws1~1994;Sverke et at, 2008;Van Icnippeuberg et al, 2006). R.esearch on change-specific outcomes has generally fonnd that participation is associated with lower levels ofresistance to change (e.g.…”
Section: Determinants Ofparticipationmentioning
confidence: 99%