2011
DOI: 10.1080/15475778.2011.623654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee Commitment to Organizational Change: Test of the Three-Component Model in Indian Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The past three decades have witnessed a growing number of studies on organizational commitment (Soumyaja, Kamalanabhan, & Bhattacharyya, 2011). The literature offers a variety of definitions of organizational commitment (Arora, Nuseir, Nusair, & Arora, 2012).…”
Section: Organizational Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past three decades have witnessed a growing number of studies on organizational commitment (Soumyaja, Kamalanabhan, & Bhattacharyya, 2011). The literature offers a variety of definitions of organizational commitment (Arora, Nuseir, Nusair, & Arora, 2012).…”
Section: Organizational Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an instance, Meyer et al (2007) studied the relationship between commitment components and behavioural support for a change in India. Also, Soumyaja, Kamalanabhan and Bhattacharyya (2011) tested the validity of the three component model in the Indian context. In addition, Kalyal and Saha (2008) focused on factors affecting public sector management employees’ CC in Pakistan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models 5 and 6: proximal-distal mediator models .-In the two models, one mediator aff ects the other in a serial rather than a parallel relation ( Preacher & Hayes, 2008 ;Hayes, 2012 ). Leadership support for change commitment and job satisfaction has a positive eff ect because of the emotional attachments (aff ective change commitment), value of long-term relationships (continuance change commitment), and the sense of obligation or duty (normative change commitment) for the common benefi t of the organization ( Herscovitch & Meyer, 2002 ;Soumyaja, Kamalanabhan, & Bhattacharyya, 2011 ). Some studies examined the infl uence of leadership on change commitment and the infl uence of job satisfaction on cooperative confl ict resolution; see Yang's (2011b ) quantitative measure (β = .48, R 2 = .23, p < .01).…”
Section: Competing Models For Leadership and Cooperative Confl Ict Rementioning
confidence: 99%