2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731114002638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical prediction of net splanchnic release of ketogenic nutrients, acetate, butyrate and β-hydroxybutyrate in ruminants: a meta-analysis

Abstract: For energy feeding systems for ruminants to evolve towards a nutrient-based system, dietary energy supply has to be determined in terms of amount and nature of nutrients. The objective of this study was to establish response equations of the net hepatic flux and net splanchnic release of acetate, butyrate and β-hydroxybutyrate to changes in diet and animal profiles. A meta-analysis was applied on published data compiled from the FLuxes of nutrients across Organs and tissues in Ruminant Animals database, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the selected publications did not systematically report the chemical composition and nutritional value of feeds and diets, the feeds and diets from all relevant publications were described according to the INRA Feed Evaluation System (2007) as detailed by Loncke et al (2009c and2015). As the nutritional status of the animals differed among publications and treatments, the availability of endogenous precursors (alanine and glycerol) coming from tissue mobilization (Leng, 1970) was estimated, when relevant, from calculated energy balance (Loncke et al, 2015) and tissue composition of mobilized energy (Supplementary Material Table S1). Because in all these experiments animals were fed with frequent meal distributions to keep nutrient supply and animal metabolism at steady state, it was considered that glycogen stores remained constant and did not contribute to net hepatic glucose output.…”
Section: Selection Of Relevant Publications From the Fluxes Of Nutriementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the selected publications did not systematically report the chemical composition and nutritional value of feeds and diets, the feeds and diets from all relevant publications were described according to the INRA Feed Evaluation System (2007) as detailed by Loncke et al (2009c and2015). As the nutritional status of the animals differed among publications and treatments, the availability of endogenous precursors (alanine and glycerol) coming from tissue mobilization (Leng, 1970) was estimated, when relevant, from calculated energy balance (Loncke et al, 2015) and tissue composition of mobilized energy (Supplementary Material Table S1). Because in all these experiments animals were fed with frequent meal distributions to keep nutrient supply and animal metabolism at steady state, it was considered that glycogen stores remained constant and did not contribute to net hepatic glucose output.…”
Section: Selection Of Relevant Publications From the Fluxes Of Nutriementioning
confidence: 99%
“…El-Sabagh et al, 2013) but failed to do so in postpartum dairy cows as reviewed by Larsen and Kristensen (2013), even after accounting for methodological effects on liver blood flow measurements. We postulated that a meta-analysis on published data would provide an overview of hepatic conversion of glucogenic precursors into glucose across a wide range of feeding and production conditions in ruminants, as in Loncke et al (2015) for ketogenic nutrients across the liver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meta-analyses were performed according to the heuristic method of Loncke et al (2015) and Sauvant, Schmidely, Daudin, and St-Pierre (2008). All data were examined graphically at each step of the analysis.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013). The study effect was considered as fixed to account for the limited number of publications eligible for the meta-analysis (Sauvant et al, 2008) and to acknowledge and explore the influence of experimental conditions on the relationships (Loncke et al, 2015). Having the study effect fixed recognizes the non-random nature of part of the variability present in the data and allows for the exploration of the experimental heterogeneity.…”
Section: Selection Of Units and Of The Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%