2010
DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v2n2p62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Investigation on the Performance of the Malaysian Real Estate Investment Trusts in Pre-Crisis, During Crisis and Post-Crisis Period

Abstract: This study examines the performance of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or listed property trusts in Malaysia using three standard performance measurement methods (Sharpe Index, Treynor Index and Jensen Index) for 1995 to 2005. In addition, it investigates the degree of systematic risks of REITs and to determine whether REITs give higher returns than the market portfolio. The results indicate that the risk-adjusted performance of REITs vary over time. REITs in general outperformed the market portfolio dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Jensen measurement shows that REITs under-performed the market portfolio in the pre GFC but out-performed in during and post GFC period. The finding differs from Hamzah and Rozali's (2010) study that reported REITs experienced poorer performance in pre and post crisis period but generated better performance during the crisis based on adjusted Sharpe, Treynor and Adjusted Jensen Alpha. The results of this study also differs from Kok and Khoo's (1995) earlier study which concluded that listed property trusts are generally out-performed the market portfolio during bear market period and under-performed during bullish market period.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Jensen measurement shows that REITs under-performed the market portfolio in the pre GFC but out-performed in during and post GFC period. The finding differs from Hamzah and Rozali's (2010) study that reported REITs experienced poorer performance in pre and post crisis period but generated better performance during the crisis based on adjusted Sharpe, Treynor and Adjusted Jensen Alpha. The results of this study also differs from Kok and Khoo's (1995) earlier study which concluded that listed property trusts are generally out-performed the market portfolio during bear market period and under-performed during bullish market period.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In 1986, Malaysia started the property trust market, known as Property Trust Funds (PTFs), the predecessor of REITs (Newell, Ting and Acheampong, 2002). Since then, it has progressed to become a well-established REIT market in Malaysia, with fourteen REITs listed as of year 2010 (Security Commission of Malaysia, 2010 REITs have been proven to be a popular and successful investment vehicle in the United States and Australia (Hamzah and Rozali, 2010). However, such does not seems to be the case in Malaysia.…”
Section: The Development Of Real Estate Investment Trust (Reits) In Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adjustment is due to the bias in the estimation of the standard deviation (Jobson and Korkie (1981)). Similar studies conducted using this method include those by Hamzah et al (2009), and Ahmad and Ibrahim (2002). Those studies used the equation as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This was mainly due to the sources of data for I-REITs being very limited as compared to their conventional counterparts; therefore, it is too early to conclude that the conventional REITs are better as compared to the Islamic REITs. Apart from that better performance during the crisis may be explained by the 'lag effect' experienced by property and construction sectors during the economic cycle transition (Hamzah and Rozali 2010). Apart from that better performance during the crisis may be explained by the 'lag effect' experienced by property and construction sectors during the economic cycle transition (Hamzah and Rozali 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%