2011
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n7p125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Investigation on Repayment Performance of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia’s Hardcore Poor Clients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, studies carried out in Malaysia indicate that microfinance has made a positive impact on poverty alleviation and performance of microenterprises. (AL-Mamun, Wahab, & Malarvizhi, 2011), for example, demonstrated that microfinancing facilities from Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) have had a positive effect on assets of micro-enterprises owned by the hardcore poor.…”
Section: Impact Of Conventional and Islamic Microfinance On Poverty Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, studies carried out in Malaysia indicate that microfinance has made a positive impact on poverty alleviation and performance of microenterprises. (AL-Mamun, Wahab, & Malarvizhi, 2011), for example, demonstrated that microfinancing facilities from Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) have had a positive effect on assets of micro-enterprises owned by the hardcore poor.…”
Section: Impact Of Conventional and Islamic Microfinance On Poverty Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saad & Duasa 92011) also demonstrated that the amount of microloans, which are accessed from AIM, has impacted significantly the economic performance of borrowers. AL-Mamun et al, (2011) illustrated that the current market value of livestock's agricultural or production equipments, agriculture stock, and raw materials, enterprise assets and motor vehicles owned by older clients are higher than new clients.…”
Section: Impact Of Conventional and Islamic Microfinance On Poverty Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HEPM is a complex model and has some limitations. Many researchers who quoted this model have labelled it as a difficult appraisal model that offers a fuller image for the impact of microfinance (Al Mamun, Abdul Wahab, & Malarvizhi, 2011;Al Mamun, Abdul Wahab, & Malarvizhi, 2010;Gobezie & Garber, 2007;Hulme, 1997Hulme, , 2000Jacobsen, Marshak, Ofori-Adjei, & Kembabazi, 2006). Hulme (1997) pointed out major application restrictions of this model like complexity in experiment, higher cost requirement, sophisticated analytical skills and time consuming.…”
Section: Modified Household Economic Portfolio Model (M -Hepm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different researchers who cited the HEP have described it as a complex evaluation model that provides a fuller picture of microfinance impacts (Al-Mamun et al , 2010, 2011; Gobezie, 2007; Hulme, 1997, 2000a; Jacobsen et al , 2006). The main practical limitations of the model can be summarized in the following points: complexity, high costs of application, requires sophisticated analytical skills and time consuming (Hulme, 1997).…”
Section: Interest In Modifying the Household Economic Portfolio For Assessing Impact In Microfinancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is mentioned in different studies where some refer to it as the HEP model, whereas others use the abbreviation HEPM or the model of Chen and Dunn (1996). Since its creation, the HEP has been cited in many studies (Al-Mamun et al , 2010, 2011; Gobezie, 2007; Haile et al , 2015; Hulme, 1997, 2000a; Jacobsen et al , 2006). Although the model provides a comprehensive evaluation framework, it suffers from some limitations that make the implementation of it quite complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%