2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical evidence of local seismic effects at sites with pronounced topography: a systematic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FSC proxy is thus useful in many regions where little or no information exists about the local geology and possible consequences of the ground shaking (i.e., landslides), providing a quantitative way to generate physical estimates (and reasonable variation ranges) for engineering purposes in mountainous regions. Yet, to investigate the amplification level, in detail, accounting on possible coupled effects due to both the local velocity structure and topography (Assimaki and Jeong, 2013;Burjánek et al, 2014;Massa et al, 2014), complementary on-field and numerical studies are convenient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FSC proxy is thus useful in many regions where little or no information exists about the local geology and possible consequences of the ground shaking (i.e., landslides), providing a quantitative way to generate physical estimates (and reasonable variation ranges) for engineering purposes in mountainous regions. Yet, to investigate the amplification level, in detail, accounting on possible coupled effects due to both the local velocity structure and topography (Assimaki and Jeong, 2013;Burjánek et al, 2014;Massa et al, 2014), complementary on-field and numerical studies are convenient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain these differences in amplification requires analysis of heterogeneous subsurface geology in combination with topography. This is beyond the scope of this paper, but the stations' subsurface geological structure is expected to have a larger effect than topographical characteristics (Burjánek et al, 2014).…”
Section: Site Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The latter aspect has been specifically investigated by Marzorati et al (2011), who highlighted the primary influence of rock mass condition (orientation and opening of fractures and joints) on ground motion amplification along rocky ridges, where site effects are generally supposed to be related to ''canonical'' morphological/topographic issues. At these sites, observed amplification cannot be explained only in terms of geometry of the topography and it is mainly controlled by the subsurface shear wave velocity profile (Paolucci et al 1999;Glinsky and Bertrand 2011;Burjánek et al 2014). Massa et al (2014) classified topographic effects into ''typical'' and ''atypical'' effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%