2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-017-2832-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical equations for flood analysis in arid zones: the Ari-Zo model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the Ф‐index does not take into account the initial abstraction losses, the infiltration results based on the Ф‐index is high. A similar high value is also obtained by Albishi et al (2017) which is about 91% in Yiba and Al Lith basins based on the Ф‐index method. The aforementioned discussion leads to the fact that the value of 77% is logical since it takes into account the initial abstraction losses and transmission losses that are included in the calculations at λ = 0.01.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since the Ф‐index does not take into account the initial abstraction losses, the infiltration results based on the Ф‐index is high. A similar high value is also obtained by Albishi et al (2017) which is about 91% in Yiba and Al Lith basins based on the Ф‐index method. The aforementioned discussion leads to the fact that the value of 77% is logical since it takes into account the initial abstraction losses and transmission losses that are included in the calculations at λ = 0.01.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This range is higher than the values obtained from the NRCS mass balance model (77% at λ = 0.01) and very far from the value of 39% at = 0.2. The values of k = 89.3% and 96.5% are in the same order of magnitude of the results of Allam and Balkhair (1987) using the Ф index method in the Yiba basin (93%) and Albishi et al (2017) in Yiba and Al Lith basins based on the Ф index method (91%). Both the rational and the Ф index methods agree with each other's since they do not consider the effect of initial abstraction losses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations