2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-010-0446-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical correlations between test methods of measuring formaldehyde emission of plywood, particleboard and medium density fiberboard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were in agreements with Park et al, 2010, who found that the emission of formaldehyde from plywood samples measured by the 1-m 3 chamber method was lower than those of particleboard and MDF samples. Furthermore, the boards-E1, had approximately the same value for each method.…”
Section: Wood-based Panelssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results were in agreements with Park et al, 2010, who found that the emission of formaldehyde from plywood samples measured by the 1-m 3 chamber method was lower than those of particleboard and MDF samples. Furthermore, the boards-E1, had approximately the same value for each method.…”
Section: Wood-based Panelssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The formaldehyde content within the plywood panels was measured according to the standard method NF EN 120 (1993) and the perforator method, the most common method used in European industries (Park et al 2011). Formaldehyde was extracted from samples of plywood panels by boiling in toluene for 2 h. The formaldehyde concentration was determined using acetylacetone analysis procedures.…”
Section: Formaldehyde Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 The majority are preferably carried out through spectrophotometric analysis, which was also the popular quality control method in the wood industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%