2016
DOI: 10.1002/adom.201500667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Comparison of Random and Periodic Surface Light‐Trapping Structures for Ultrathin Silicon Photovoltaics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A numerical mesh-based FDTD formalism ( Lumerical Solutions, Inc., 2017 ) was used to model the 3D electric field distribution produced in the two types of structures shown in Figure 1 . This is a widely employed method to calculate the optical response of thin-film solar cells with photonic structures, having arbitrary materials and geometries ( Grandidier et al., 2011 , Brongersma et al., 2014 , Branham et al., 2016 , Mendes et al., 2016 , Sanchez-Sobrado et al., 2017 ). The details of the computational method are given in Section S1 of Supplemental Information .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A numerical mesh-based FDTD formalism ( Lumerical Solutions, Inc., 2017 ) was used to model the 3D electric field distribution produced in the two types of structures shown in Figure 1 . This is a widely employed method to calculate the optical response of thin-film solar cells with photonic structures, having arbitrary materials and geometries ( Grandidier et al., 2011 , Brongersma et al., 2014 , Branham et al., 2016 , Mendes et al., 2016 , Sanchez-Sobrado et al., 2017 ). The details of the computational method are given in Section S1 of Supplemental Information .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimized texturing has shown absorption enhancements in crystalline silicon (c-Si) wafers close to the fundamental 4n 2 LT limit of geometrical optics ( Ingenito et al., 2014 ). However, when applied in thin-film cells, the textures' size must be reduced along with the absorber thickness, which lowers their LT effects ( Haug and Ballif, 2015 , Branham et al., 2016 ). Nonetheless, the main drawback of texturing is that it increases the roughness (hence surface area) and defect density in the PV material, which deteriorate the cells' electrical transport via the increase of charge carrier trapping and recombination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,[18][19][20] Additionally, recent studies have shown that triangular, pyramidal, or conical gratings exhibit higher absorption due to the impedance match from air to silicon. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]28,30,39 To improve light trapping even further, the inclusion of a back grating structure has been studied as a means to better scatter near-infrared light into guided resonances. [12][13][14]17,[27][28]33 By combining a front and back grating, recent studies have demonstrated enhancement to light trapping that outperforms absorbers that are textured only on one side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14]17,[27][28]33 By combining a front and back grating, recent studies have demonstrated enhancement to light trapping that outperforms absorbers that are textured only on one side. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Further improvements for these double grating structures have included the introduction of a phase shift through misalignment of two gratings and the use of blazed gratings to break symmetry. 30,[38][39][40] To optimize the double grating structure, a general design strategy was proposed in which the front grating is treated as an anti-reflection layer to couple incident light while the back grating diffracts light into guided modes to trap it within the thin film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation