Abstract:This study provides empirical benchmarks that quantify typical changes in students’ reports of social and emotional skills in a large, diverse sample. Data come from six cohorts of students (N = 361,815; 6% Asian, 8% Black, 68% White, 75% Latinx, 50% Female) who responded to the CORE survey from 2015 to 2018 and help quantify typical gains/declines in growth mindset, self‐efficacy, self‐management, and social awareness. Results show fluctuations in skills between 4th and 12th grade (changes ranging from −.33 t… Show more
“…Extensive analyses established evidence suggesting the wording was simple enough not to confuse English learning students (West, Buckley, et al, 2018). See West, Buckley, et al (2018) or Gelbach and Hough (2018) for background and Loeb et al (2019), Soland et al (2019), and Soland et al (2022) for psychometric analyses.…”
Educators have become increasingly committed to social and emotional learning in schools. However, we know too little about the typical growth trajectories of the competencies that schools are striving to improve. We leverage data from the California Office to Reform Education, a consortium of districts in California serving over 1.5 million students, that administers annual surveys to students to measure social and emotional competencies (SECs). This article uses data from six cohorts of approximately 16,000 students each (51% male, 73% Latinx, 11% White, 10% Black, 24% with parents who did not complete high school) in Grades 4–12. Two questions are addressed. First, how much growth occurs in growth mindset, self-efficacy, self-management, and social awareness from Grades 4 to 12? Second, do initial status and growth look different by parental educational attainment and gender? Using accelerated longitudinal design growth models, findings show distinct growth trends among the four SECs with growth mindset increasing, self-management mostly decreasing, and self-efficacy and social awareness decreasing and then increasing. The subgroup analyses show gaps between groups but patterns of growth that are more similar than different. Further, subgroup membership accounts for very little variation in growth or declines. Instead, initial levels of competencies predict growth. Also, variation within groups is greater than variation between groups. The findings have practical implications for educators and psychologists striving to improve SECs. If schools use student-report approaches, predicting steady and consistent positive growth in SECs is unrealistic. Instead, U-shaped patterns for some SECs appear to be normative with notable declines in the sixth grade, requiring new supports.
“…Extensive analyses established evidence suggesting the wording was simple enough not to confuse English learning students (West, Buckley, et al, 2018). See West, Buckley, et al (2018) or Gelbach and Hough (2018) for background and Loeb et al (2019), Soland et al (2019), and Soland et al (2022) for psychometric analyses.…”
Educators have become increasingly committed to social and emotional learning in schools. However, we know too little about the typical growth trajectories of the competencies that schools are striving to improve. We leverage data from the California Office to Reform Education, a consortium of districts in California serving over 1.5 million students, that administers annual surveys to students to measure social and emotional competencies (SECs). This article uses data from six cohorts of approximately 16,000 students each (51% male, 73% Latinx, 11% White, 10% Black, 24% with parents who did not complete high school) in Grades 4–12. Two questions are addressed. First, how much growth occurs in growth mindset, self-efficacy, self-management, and social awareness from Grades 4 to 12? Second, do initial status and growth look different by parental educational attainment and gender? Using accelerated longitudinal design growth models, findings show distinct growth trends among the four SECs with growth mindset increasing, self-management mostly decreasing, and self-efficacy and social awareness decreasing and then increasing. The subgroup analyses show gaps between groups but patterns of growth that are more similar than different. Further, subgroup membership accounts for very little variation in growth or declines. Instead, initial levels of competencies predict growth. Also, variation within groups is greater than variation between groups. The findings have practical implications for educators and psychologists striving to improve SECs. If schools use student-report approaches, predicting steady and consistent positive growth in SECs is unrealistic. Instead, U-shaped patterns for some SECs appear to be normative with notable declines in the sixth grade, requiring new supports.
“…Thus, we provide recommendations to navigate this research as it continues to evolve in order to set goals based on (a) standardized rates of growth and (b) individual pre- and post-test scores. First, we point to research conducted by Soland and colleagues (2022), which lists benchmark gains for a large sample of students in Grades 4 through 12 who self-reported their SEL skills. Gains across school years for SEL were notedly variable, ranging from −0.33 to 0.23 pooled standard deviations depending on the grade level and component skills measured.…”
Section: Using Progress-monitoring Data For Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bruhn and colleagues (2018) provided a step-by-step guide to data-based decision-making related to behavioral intervention. Such guidance has not yet been described for social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions (McKown, 2019; Soland et al, 2022).…”
The collection of student data through screening and progress monitoring of social and emotional learning (SEL) skills is just as important as the implementation of curriculum and practices. Monitoring skill acquisition allows teachers to identify effective practices, provide intervention, and intensify support for students who need it. In this article, we provide a practical demonstration of how to make instructional decisions based on screening and progress monitoring of student SEL skill acquisition.
“…Finally, studies provide mixed evidence on certain SEL skills by age groups. Generally, studies consistently suggest that self-management (e.g., Duckworth et al, 2010; West et al, 2020) and self-efficacy (e.g., Pajares et al, 2000; Schunk & Meece, 2006; Schunk & Pajares, 2002) both decline in middle school during the onset of early adolescence (Soland et al, 2022). The findings on growth mindset are mixed (Pintrich & Zusho, 2002; West et al, 2020; Wigfield et al, 1996) and the array of evidence on this construct by age is limited, as much of the growth mindset literature focuses on the relationship between growth mindset and academic achievement rather than the construct in and of itself.…”
Reclassification can be an important juncture in the academic experience of English Learners (ELs). Literature has explored the potential for reclassification to influence academic outcomes like achievement, yet its impact on social-emotional learning (SEL) skills, which are as malleable and important to long-term success, remains unclear. Using a regression discontinuity design, we examine the causal effect of reclassification on SEL skills (self-efficacy, growth mindset, self-management, and social awareness) among 4th to 8th graders. In the districts studied, reclassification improved academic self-efficacy by 0.2 standard deviations for students near the threshold. Results are robust to alternative specifications and analyses. Given this evidence, we discuss ways districts might establish practices that instill more positive academic beliefs among ELs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.