2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Intelligence and Day-To-Day Emotion Regulation Processes: Examining Motives for Social Sharing

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with previous works (e.g., Bucich & MacCann, 2019;Cabello et al, 2013;Megías-Robles et al, 2019), the novel contribution of the present study is that we provide an explanation of how EI and ER difficulties use different routes (i.e., affective dimensions) and have their specific influence on the affective outcome: EI moderates changes in the affective dimension of valence through the intra-and interpersonal utilization of emotions, while individual differences in ER have a broader impact on both valence and arousal dimensions through emotional clarity, awareness, and impulse. We identified specific ways in which individual differences modify a successful ER process when using a CR strategy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with previous works (e.g., Bucich & MacCann, 2019;Cabello et al, 2013;Megías-Robles et al, 2019), the novel contribution of the present study is that we provide an explanation of how EI and ER difficulties use different routes (i.e., affective dimensions) and have their specific influence on the affective outcome: EI moderates changes in the affective dimension of valence through the intra-and interpersonal utilization of emotions, while individual differences in ER have a broader impact on both valence and arousal dimensions through emotional clarity, awareness, and impulse. We identified specific ways in which individual differences modify a successful ER process when using a CR strategy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Using the experience sample method, Bucich and MacCann (2019) found that self-rated EI predicts more social sharing, direct situation modification, and reappraisal, while ability EI does not predict any of the five ER strategies.…”
Section: Ei and Er Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bucich and MacCann () used experience sampling to measure average levels of five emotion regulation strategies (situation modification, distraction, rumination, reappraisal and social sharing) across 5 days. Emotion regulation strategies are conceptually similar to the coping strategies investigated in the stress and coping literature.…”
Section: What's Happening Now? Current Efforts In Australian Ei Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, a significant body of research has documented the predictive validity of EI across a wide array of psychological domains. For instance, EI has been found to predict a set of health-related dimensions and behaviors [2,3], subjective well-being [4], cognitive and affective academic engagement [5], career decision making [6], or social sharing motives [7], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%