2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional arousal and recognition memory are differentially reflected in pupil diameter responses during emotional memory for negative events in younger and older adults

Abstract: A better memory for negative emotional events is often attributed to a conjoint impact of increased arousal and noradrenergic modulation. A decline in noradrenergic modulation (NA) during ageing is well documented but its impact on memory function during ageing is unclear. Using pupil diameter (PD) as a proxy for noradrenergic modulation, we examined age differences in memory for negative events in younger (18-30 years) and older (62-83 years) adults based upon a segregation of early arousal to negative events… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As processing salient events (outcomes) in our task happened within a task context that required a focus on outcomes, we cannot address these 2 aspects separately in this study. Indeed, pupillometric responses of comparable strength in younger and older adults are not unprecedented in feedback-based learning tasks (Hämmerer et al., 2017). In the context of our task, this suggests that the strength of attentional focus on outcome evaluation might have been comparable in younger and older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As processing salient events (outcomes) in our task happened within a task context that required a focus on outcomes, we cannot address these 2 aspects separately in this study. Indeed, pupillometric responses of comparable strength in younger and older adults are not unprecedented in feedback-based learning tasks (Hämmerer et al., 2017). In the context of our task, this suggests that the strength of attentional focus on outcome evaluation might have been comparable in younger and older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As hypothesized, we found a significant main effect of pictures’ valence indicating that memory performance improved with increasing unpleasantness (hits and overall performance). This finding is in line with and extends the results of studies using different paradigms and stimuli (Bless, Hamilton & Mackie, ; Charles et al ., ; Dreben, Fiske & Hastle, ; Grady, Hongwanishkul, Keightley, Lee & Hasher, ; Grühn et al ., ; Hämmerer et al ., ; Ohira et al ., ; Pratto & John, ; Robinson‐Riegler & Winton, ; Skowronski & Carlston, ; but see Chainay, Michael, Vert‐pré, Landré & Plasson, ). One way to interpret these findings is through the principle of negativity bias according to which “bad is stronger than good” across a broad range of psychological phenomena (Baumeister et al ., ; Rozin & Royzman, ; see Introduction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fifth, in future studies it would appear important to control in the analyses for potential differences in time spent on the selfpaced recognition task. Sixth, the role of physiological responses at stimulus encoding and recognition for memory performance would be another issue to investigate (Gavazzeni, Anderson, B€ ackman, Wiens & Fischer, 2012;H€ ammerer et al, 2017). Finally, interpretation of the results regarding age-related vs. cohort effects requires caution because of the cross-sectional study design.…”
Section: Limitations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La primera de las hipótesis planteadas fue que la información con contenido emocional sería mayormente recordada que la neutra. Efectivamente, las imágenes emocionales fueron calificadas como más activantes que las neutras y este nivel de emocionalidad/activación repercutió en el recuerdo, ya que las imágenes emocionales fueron mayormente recordadas que las neutras, tanto de modo inmediato como diferido (Hämmerer et al, 2017;Justel et al, 2014;Schümann, Bayer, Talmi y Sommer, 2018). Hay explicaciones posibles a porqué la información emocional es recordada en mayor medida al ser comparada con información neutra, por ejemplo, se les presta mayor atención a los detalles (McGaugh y Roozendaal, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified