2000
DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion regulation as a mediator of associations between mother–child attachment and peer relationships in middle childhood.

Abstract: Although a link between attachment and peer relationships has been established, the mechanisms that account for this link have not been identified. The 1st goal of this study was to test emotion regulation as a mediator of this link in middle childhood. The 2nd goal was to examine how different aspects of emotion regulation relate to peer competence. Fifth graders completed self-report and semiprojective measures to index mother-child attachment, mothers reported on children's emotionality and coping strategie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
134
1
17

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(53 reference statements)
8
134
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that these remaining direct paths involve coping strategies that can be seen as more close to internal working models of self (e.g., Active/Reflexive and Avoidant), and others (Seeking Support) (Ognibene & Collins, 1998), as well as internalized features of attachment experiences (e.g., attachment strategies). Consistent with previous research, having an emotional close and confident relationship with parents and feeling this relationship as a source of support and comfort, seems to be a learning context for emotion regulation and coping processes (Contreras, Kerns, Weimer, Gentzler, & Tomich, 2000;Wei, Vogel, Tsun-Yao Ku, & Zakalik, 2005). Although the measure used asked participants to report on their present relationships, current attachment relationships are argue to be influenced, at some extent, by past and early interactions (Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002;Sroufe, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is worth mentioning that these remaining direct paths involve coping strategies that can be seen as more close to internal working models of self (e.g., Active/Reflexive and Avoidant), and others (Seeking Support) (Ognibene & Collins, 1998), as well as internalized features of attachment experiences (e.g., attachment strategies). Consistent with previous research, having an emotional close and confident relationship with parents and feeling this relationship as a source of support and comfort, seems to be a learning context for emotion regulation and coping processes (Contreras, Kerns, Weimer, Gentzler, & Tomich, 2000;Wei, Vogel, Tsun-Yao Ku, & Zakalik, 2005). Although the measure used asked participants to report on their present relationships, current attachment relationships are argue to be influenced, at some extent, by past and early interactions (Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002;Sroufe, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Children with more secure attachments are also better at regulating their emotions, using more constructive coping strategies such as problem solving and seeking support from others, than are less secure children Contreras, Kerns, Weimer, Gentzler, & Tomich, 2000;Thomson, 2001). Peer relationships and emotion regulation have also been linked to anxiety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, available evidence indicates that greater attachment security in 8-to 12-year-olds is associated, contemporaneously, with more competent emotional coping strategies (Contreras, Kerns, Weimer, Gentzler, & Tomich, 2000;Kerns, Abraham, Schlegelmilch, & Morgan, 2007), enhanced emotion identification (Brumariu, Kerns, & Seibert, 2012), increased regulation of threat-induced reactivity (Borelli et al, 2010), and more mature selection of emotion regulation strategies when confronted with hypothetical challenges (Colle & Del Giudice, 2011). However, we would be remiss not to acknowledge that Kim and Page (2013) failed to detect links between attachment and emotional regulation in this age group.…”
Section: Attachment and Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%