2014
DOI: 10.2478/mms-2014-0049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion Monitoring – Verification of Physiological Characteristics Measurement Procedures

Abstract: This paper concerns measurement procedures on an emotion monitoring stand designed for tracking human emotions in the Human-Computer Interaction with physiological characteristics. The paper addresses the key problem of physiological measurements being disturbed by a motion typical for human-computer interaction such as keyboard typing or mouse movements. An original experiment is described, that aimed at practical evaluation of measurement procedures performed at the emotion monitoring stand constructed at GU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting approach would be incorporating some physiological measurements, which could be indicators of stress. However, this would require usage of special devices and coping with the problem of the sensitiveness of some biometric sensors to finger movements [16] [17]. Thus it could not be implemented in an experiment performed in a real life situation as the one described.…”
Section: B Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another interesting approach would be incorporating some physiological measurements, which could be indicators of stress. However, this would require usage of special devices and coping with the problem of the sensitiveness of some biometric sensors to finger movements [16] [17]. Thus it could not be implemented in an experiment performed in a real life situation as the one described.…”
Section: B Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all of them seem practical in any situation, e.g. physiological signals not only require specialized devices and disturb computer users, but these measurements are also disturbed by motions typical for human-computer interaction [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 2 skin conductance sensors placed on: left-hand fingers and right-hand wrist (for right-handed participants). The locations of the sensors were chosen based on a previous study on the interference of mouse and keyboard usage movements with physiological signals from the fingers [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proxy metric for the skin conductance input channel was the number of events that disrupt the channel per time unit (minute) and the events were defined as mouse clicks, which introduced movement artefacts to the EDA signal. The SC sensors (we used two) were placed on the base of the finger and on the wrist [25] and although not all mouse clicks introduced artefacts, most of them did.…”
Section: Operationalisation Of Experiments Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper choice of measured parameters, as well as placement of the electrodes, was based on the data obtained from the literature. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The heart rate can be obtained from electrocardiographic sensor, placed on chest, or from blood-volume pulse sensor, placed on¯nger tips or ears. [5][6][7] In the experiment, blood volume pulse (BVP) was recorded in two locations simultaneously (ears and¯ngers) in order to immune to movement artifacts.…”
Section: Experiments 21 Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%