2018
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-1006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EmoFinder: The meeting point for Spanish emotional words

Abstract: We present here emoFinder ( http://usc.es/pcc/emofinder ), a Web-based search engine for Spanish word properties taken from different normative databases. The tool incorporates several subjective word properties for 16,375 distinct words. Although it focuses particularly on normative ratings for emotional dimensions (e.g., valence and arousal) and discrete emotional categories (fear, disgust, anger, happiness, and sadness), it also makes available ratings for other word properties that are known to affect word… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These were the words to be learned during the acquisition phase (i.e., old words). They were obtained from several Spanish normative databases, using the emoFinder online search engine (Fraga et al, 2018). Values were taken mainly from the Spanish adaptation of ANEW (Redondo et al, 2007), but some values were not available here and were obtained from Ferré et al (2012), Guasch et al (2016), and Hinojosa et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were the words to be learned during the acquisition phase (i.e., old words). They were obtained from several Spanish normative databases, using the emoFinder online search engine (Fraga et al, 2018). Values were taken mainly from the Spanish adaptation of ANEW (Redondo et al, 2007), but some values were not available here and were obtained from Ferré et al (2012), Guasch et al (2016), and Hinojosa et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason is the absence of normative studies that provide norms for a word's emotional variables assessed by children of different ages. In fact, research on the interaction between language and emotion in adults has expanded in recent years as the availability of datasets with such types of ratings has increased (for reviews, see Citron, 2012;Fraga, Guasch, Haro, Padrón, & Ferré, 2018;Hinojosa, Moreno, & Ferré, 2019;Kissler, Assadollahi, & Herbert, 2006). Most of these normative studies are based on a dimensional theoretical approach of emotion (Russell & Ridgeway, 1983;Russell & Bullock, 1986;Scherer, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of these variables were obtained from the following sources (with the help of the emoFinder online search engine, cf. Fraga et al, 2018): AoA ratings were taken from the databases of Alonso et al (2015), Haro et al (2017), andHinojosa, Rincón-Pérez, et al (2016); the ratings of arousal were taken from the databases of Ferré et al (2012), Guasch et al (2016), Haro et al (2017), and Stadthagen-González et al (2017; the ratings of concreteness and familiarity were obtained from the databases of Duchon et al (2013, EsPal), Ferré et al (2012), Guasch et al (2016), Haro et al (2017), ; and the ratings of log bigram frequency, log contextual diversity, log lemma frequency, log trigram frequency, log frequency, old20, NHF, N, number of syllables, and word length were taken from EsPal (Duchon et al, 2013). Of note, the values of some of these variables were not available for some words in the aforementioned databases (specifically AoA, arousal, concreteness, and familiarity).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%