2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emitter near an arbitrary body: Purcell effect, optical theorem and the Wheeler–Feynman absorber

Abstract: The altered spontaneous emission of an emitter near an arbitrary body can be elucidated using an energy balance of the electromagnetic field. From a classical point of view it is trivial to show that the field scattered back from any body should alter the emission of the source. But it is not at all apparent that the total radiative and non-radiative decay in an arbitrary body can add to the vacuum decay rate of the emitter (i.e.) an increase of emission that is just as much as the body absorbs and radiates in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
22
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Also very large Q factors and mode volumes imply both acute specificity of the spectral range of operation and relatively larger size of these devices, which may not be advantageous. Hence recently, Purcell effect mediated decay rate engineering using plasmonic nano-antenna [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] or even metallodielectric antenna 35 has been suggested as an alternative with the advantage that although the Q factors are smaller than the corresponding photonic crystal based cavities, huge reduction in mode volumes can be obtained leading to possibility of very high F p . In addition, such coupling can also be enhanced by reducing the separation between an emitter or quantum dot with a metal nano-antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also very large Q factors and mode volumes imply both acute specificity of the spectral range of operation and relatively larger size of these devices, which may not be advantageous. Hence recently, Purcell effect mediated decay rate engineering using plasmonic nano-antenna [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] or even metallodielectric antenna 35 has been suggested as an alternative with the advantage that although the Q factors are smaller than the corresponding photonic crystal based cavities, huge reduction in mode volumes can be obtained leading to possibility of very high F p . In addition, such coupling can also be enhanced by reducing the separation between an emitter or quantum dot with a metal nano-antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it can be separated to radiative part that corresponds to light scattering to far field and nonradiative part that is transferred to the plasmon mode and thus absorbed by the metal particle. Both decay channels are affected by the particle presence and contribute to the modified emitter dynamics [14].…”
Section: Simulation Methods and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first term in the right part of (9) already appeared in [23] the second one corresponds to the total dipole radiation cross-section. Let us consider the representation for the electric dipole field in D 0 extracting the singular part as ( here η 2 0;1 ¼ λ 2 Àk 2 0;1 ; k 0;1 ¼ k U n 0;1 and…”
Section: Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We already mentioned that the first term in the right part of (17) already appeared in [23]. Let us introduce the conventional scattering cross-section С 7…”
Section: Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation