1997
DOI: 10.1364/ao.36.002609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissivity of rough sea surface for 8–13 µm: modeling and verification

Abstract: The emissivity model for rough sea surface [Remote Sensing Environ. 24, 313-329 (1988)] is inspected in light of the measured surface emissivity. In the presence of moderate wind (5 m/s or less), the emissivity model is found to be adequate for small to moderate view angles. For large view angles, the discrepancy between the computed and the measured emissivity is large, but one can reduce this considerably by incorporating the reflected sea surface emission into the emissivity model. In addition, examination … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
135
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For AIRS, these spectral surface emissivities have been interpolated to the AIRS wavelengths. Over ocean, the surface emissivity is set to 0.99 for λ i < 10 µm and 0.98 for λ i ≥ 10 µm (Wu and Smith, 1997). Over snow and ice, the spectral surface emissivities are taken from Hori et al (2006) and, as they depend on the viewing zenith angle, they had to be corrected like in Smith et al (1996).…”
Section: Preparation and Comparison Of Atmospheric And Surface Ancillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For AIRS, these spectral surface emissivities have been interpolated to the AIRS wavelengths. Over ocean, the surface emissivity is set to 0.99 for λ i < 10 µm and 0.98 for λ i ≥ 10 µm (Wu and Smith, 1997). Over snow and ice, the spectral surface emissivities are taken from Hori et al (2006) and, as they depend on the viewing zenith angle, they had to be corrected like in Smith et al (1996).…”
Section: Preparation and Comparison Of Atmospheric And Surface Ancillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach used by our regression algorithm (Zhou et al, 2002), we compress the surface emissivity into PC scores as well. The surface emissivity EOFs were generated from an ensemble of surface emissivities calculated using the Musuda ocean emissivity model (Musuda, 1988;Wu and Smith, 1997) and selected from the Salisbury emissivity library (Salisbury and D'Aria, 1992). The atmospheric temperature and moisture profile EOFs were generated from regional radiosondes.…”
Section: Description Of a Physical Retrieval Algorithm Based On Pcrtmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For water surfaces, we use the IRSSE model by van Delst and Wu (2000) to calculate the surface emissivity 10 in RemoTeC. This model is an update of Wu and Smith (1997) and the calculated emissivity is a function of sea-roughness as determined by the wind speed, viewing angle, and wavelength of the radiation. Furthermore, we consider atmospheric absorption by H 2 O, CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO 2 from the HITRAN 2008 database (Rothman et al, 2009) and describe atmospheric continuum absorption using the model by Mlawer et al (2012) to account for broad-band contributions from water, carbon dioxide, oxygen, nitrogen, and ozone.…”
Section: Forward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach to validate methane total column retrieval from shortwave infrared measurements is to compare the retrieved column to co-located ground-based measurements of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) (Wunch et al, 2011 atmospheric altitudes, leading to highly accurate estimates of the total column of methane rather than a profile. Because of the lack of other validation measurements, we decided to use these data for our product validation.…”
Section: Validation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%