Emissions Markets and Products

Chesney, Marc; Taschini, Luca; Gheyssens, Jonathan

doi:10.1002/9781119011590.ch5

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, in describing how the newly assembled Euphrates was taken on a proving run upriver, past the town of Birecik, Chesney alleged that seeing the steamship 'stemming a rapid current, their astonishment knew no bounds; "ten Englishmen," they said, "could take their town,"' before they apparently attributed several miracles to the ship's supernatural power. 61 Indeed, accounts of the Euphrates Expedition are rife with references to the purported superstition of the Arabs to the apparently talismanic power of the British steamships. Assigning wonder, amazement and fear to 'credulous' and unscientific 'natives' in response to technological 'marvels' (especially telescopes, but also often steamships) were all already well-established tropes in exploration narratives in this period, and Chesney and his officers leaned on them heavily.…”

Section: Technological Mastery 'Moral Power' and Tropes Of Superioritymentioning

confidence: 99%

Empire, Exploration and ‘Failure’: The Euphrates Expedition and the Route to India that Never Was

Fleetwood

2023

The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the early nineteenth century, Suez was not the only possibility for a shortcut between Britain and its rapidly expanding Indian empire. Serious consideration was also given to a route via Mesopotamia. In 1835, the lavishly funded Euphrates Expedition set out to determine the suitability of the river for steam navigation, assess the political complications, and complete maps and natural historical surveys. The Expedition began with an extraordinarily laborious overland transport through Syria, hauling two dismantled steamships across the desert, a process resisted by both Ottoman and Egyptian authorities. Things did not become much easier upon reaching the river, and a series of calamities ensued, most significantly the complete loss of one of the steamers in a hurricane.In this article, I use the Euphrates Expedition to consider various notions of 'failure' and breakdown in the histories of empire, science and exploration. In terms of everyday expeditionary practice, the Expedition might be seen as a series of cascading failures, from cross-cultural negotiation to technological limits, and it was in another sense an imperial 'failure' as 'the route to India that never was.' At the same time, this article interrogates a tension in the historiography around what it means to tell the story of imperial exploration and surveying as one of limits, confusion, vulnerability and dependencyor ultimately 'failure'given the often pervasive legacies and consequences of these activities for the places and peoples surveyed.

show abstract

Section: Technological Mastery 'Moral Power' and Tropes Of Superioritymentioning

confidence: 99%