2012
DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions Certification Vehicle Cycles Based on Heavy Duty Engine Test Cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis comparing CO 2 emissions from these certification test procedures to over-the- road vehicle fuel consumption data reveals the significant level of agreement [28]. For line-haul truck duty-cycles, CO 2 emissions from vehicle field data were within 3.7% of the CO 2 emissions predicted from the SET [28]. This particular study involved the collection of data from 8 line-haul trucks with data acquisitions systems to allow fuel to be tracked at 1 second intervals during normal operation.…”
Section: Component-based Approach For Vocational Trucks and Line-haulmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An analysis comparing CO 2 emissions from these certification test procedures to over-the- road vehicle fuel consumption data reveals the significant level of agreement [28]. For line-haul truck duty-cycles, CO 2 emissions from vehicle field data were within 3.7% of the CO 2 emissions predicted from the SET [28]. This particular study involved the collection of data from 8 line-haul trucks with data acquisitions systems to allow fuel to be tracked at 1 second intervals during normal operation.…”
Section: Component-based Approach For Vocational Trucks and Line-haulmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For vocational engines, the approach applies the EPA heavy-duty engine transient emissions test -Federal Test Procedure (FTP) -for CO 2 measurement. An analysis comparing CO 2 emissions from these certification test procedures to over-the- road vehicle fuel consumption data reveals the significant level of agreement [28]. For line-haul truck duty-cycles, CO 2 emissions from vehicle field data were within 3.7% of the CO 2 emissions predicted from the SET [28].…”
Section: Component-based Approach For Vocational Trucks and Line-haulmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study by Wu et al showed that real world NO X emissions from Euro IV certified heavy-duty buses using SCR exhaust aftertreatment systems were substantially higher than the certified limit suggesting that the certification cycle does not accurately represent real-world conditions. Andreae et al found that poor vehicle integration and misalignment of engine and vehicle test cycles can be significant contributors to the emissions discrepancy. Low-load driving at slow speeds can also cause elevated NO X emissions in heavy-duty diesel engines equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR) devices for reducing NO X emissions due to low temperature inactivity of SCR catalysts. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For heavy-duty vehicles in the US, instead of chassis dynamometer testing, only engine dynamometer testing over the Transient Heavy Duty Engine FTP cycle is required by federal regulations. Standard cycles for chassis or engine dynamometers offer a way to compare performance between different vehicles, however, they don't necessarily represent the behavior of all real-world operation [2]. Therefore, investigations are devoted to create representative driving cycles indicative of real world vehicle operation for specific traffic conditions in a particular area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%