2015
DOI: 10.15531/ksccr.2015.6.4.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission Characteristics of Air Pollutants from Meat Charbroiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall average emission rate of PM 2.5 relative to PM 10 for the 5 test restaurants was 0.98, which indicated that most of the particulate matter formed from charbroiling fine dust was smaller than 2.5 µm. This value was slightly higher than other reported values such as 0.95 for pork roasting, 0.88-0.97 for various meats and 0.77 to 0.98 for pork and beef (Park et al, 2015;Heo et al, 2016). Most of the total particulate matter (TMP), 93-98%, belonged to PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Emission Characteristics Particulate Mattercontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall average emission rate of PM 2.5 relative to PM 10 for the 5 test restaurants was 0.98, which indicated that most of the particulate matter formed from charbroiling fine dust was smaller than 2.5 µm. This value was slightly higher than other reported values such as 0.95 for pork roasting, 0.88-0.97 for various meats and 0.77 to 0.98 for pork and beef (Park et al, 2015;Heo et al, 2016). Most of the total particulate matter (TMP), 93-98%, belonged to PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Emission Characteristics Particulate Mattercontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Incomplete combustion from the conversion of 22.6 (0.5-37.9) 22.8 (0.6-60.8) 0.98 0.97 fat-forming elements in the meat to oily phases at high temperatures over charcoal generated a large amount of smoke. The concentration of particulate matter was highly related to meat type, grilling amount, fat content and seasonings added (Park et al, 2015;Heo et al, 2016). On the other hand, the average emission factors (EFs) of PMs and PAHs for on-site cooking at five restaurants were evaluated and are summarized in Table 5.…”
Section: Emission Characteristics Particulate Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation