2008
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Agents in the Treatment of Anthracycline- and Taxane-Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemotherapeutic regimens containing taxanes and anthracyclines are the current standard of care for hormone-refractory MBC, and are being used earlier in the course of the disease with increasing frequency [2][3][4]. Sequential single-agent therapies including capecitabine, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine are preferred to combination regimens for MBC progressing after anthracyclines and taxanes, with capecitabine being the only approved monotherapy [5][6][7][8][9]. While these agents exhibit antitumor activity in this patient population, none showed a survival benefit either alone or in combination with other drugs [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemotherapeutic regimens containing taxanes and anthracyclines are the current standard of care for hormone-refractory MBC, and are being used earlier in the course of the disease with increasing frequency [2][3][4]. Sequential single-agent therapies including capecitabine, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine are preferred to combination regimens for MBC progressing after anthracyclines and taxanes, with capecitabine being the only approved monotherapy [5][6][7][8][9]. While these agents exhibit antitumor activity in this patient population, none showed a survival benefit either alone or in combination with other drugs [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequential single-agent therapies including capecitabine, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine are preferred to combination regimens for MBC progressing after anthracyclines and taxanes, with capecitabine being the only approved monotherapy [5][6][7][8][9]. While these agents exhibit antitumor activity in this patient population, none showed a survival benefit either alone or in combination with other drugs [8,9]. The prognosis is particularly unfavorable for patients with a reduced performance status who are typically more symptomatic and less responsive to treatment than those with a good performance status [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FPGS converts the drug to the predominant pentaglutamate form that leads to an enhanced intracellular retention of the drug and more potent inhibition of TS, DHFR and GARFT than the monoglutamate form. This agent is broadly active in a wide variety of solid tumours, including non-small-cell lung [27], breast [28], bladder [29], head and neck [30], and ovarian cancers [31], as well as mesothelioma [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early trials studied chemotherapy in patients who had not received prior adjuvant treatment 13 . As adjuvant chemotherapy became increasingly common, anthracycline-and taxane-based regimens became embedded in practice as standard treatments in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting 12,13,15 . Thus, the choice of therapy in the metastatic setting is now increasingly influenced by issues of cumulative toxicity and resistance.…”
Section: Chemotherapy For Mbc: the Current State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%