Emergency Medicine in the Developing World: A Delphi Study

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency medicine (EM) as a specialty has developed rapidly in the western world, but remains largely immature in developing nations. There is an urgent need for emergency services, but no clear guidelines are available on the priorities for establishing EM in the developing world. This study seeks to establish consensus on key areas of EM development in developing world settings, with respect to scope of EM, staffing needs, training requirements, and research priorities.Methods: A three-round Delphi study was conducted via e-mail. A panel was convened of 50 EM specialists or equivalent, with experience in or interest in EM in the developing world. In the first round, panelists provided free-text statements on scope, staffing, training, and research priorities for EM in the developing world. A five-point Likert scale was used to rate agreement with the statements in Rounds 2 and 3. Consensus statements are presented as a series of synopsis statements for each of the four major themes.Results: A total of 168 of 208 statements (81%) had reached consensus at the end of the study. Key areas in which consensus was reached included EM being a specialist-driven service, with substantial role for nonphysicians. International training courses should be adapted to local needs. EM research in developing countries should be clinically driven and focus on local issues of importance. Conclusions:The scope and function of EM and relationships with other specialties are defined. Unambiguous principles are laid out for the development of the specialty in developing world environments. The next step required in this process is translation into practical guidelines for the development of EM in developing world settings where they may be used to drive policy, protocols, and research.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:765-774 ª

Emergency care research priorities in South Africap

“…[20,21] Cost-effectiveness of emergency medical interventions and quality assurance are considered global priorities. [6,21] According to the Institute of Medicine in the USA, a healthcare system should aim to be safe, effective, efficient, patient-centred, timely and equi table.…”

“…[4] Research in the field of emergency care specifically related to LMICs is sparse. A single consensus study related to clinical research priorities, emergency centre management and administration exists, [6] but there are no lists or identified gaps for any aspects of emergency or acute care specific to SA.…”

Reliability and accuracy of the South African Triage Scale when used by nurses in the emergency department of Timergara Hospital, Pakistan

“…[1] In many LMICs, one of the main challenges facing emergency services is the capacity to deal with high patient loads. [2] The process of 'triage' is one way of addressing this challenge, since it optimises the allocation and use of existing resources.…”

Lithuanian Emergency Medical Assistance System Management Improvement Strategy

“…On summarising the views of scientists (Kaluzny, 2006;Hodkinson, 2010), none of the individual health care management models is able to provide all the opportunities, however, different models offer various useful insights into the objectives, contexts, and management fuctions. According to C. Donaldson (1996), health care needs can only be met through the use of health care services which are the result of the system operation.…”