Emergency Laparotomy in the Critically Ill: Futility at the Bedside

Abstract

Background Critically ill patients are often evaluated for an intra-abdominal catastrophe. In the absence of a preoperative diagnosis, abdominal exploration may be offered despite desperate circumstances. We hypothesize that (1) abdominal exploration for such patients is associated with a high mortality and (2) commonly obtained physiologic measures at laparotomy anticipate mortality. Methods All acute care surgery (ACS) patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at a quaternary referral center during a 3-year period were reviewed. Inclusion was defined by emergency laparotomy in the operating room (OR) in a patient with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥4 or bedside laparotomy in the ICU (BSL). Mortality was the primary endpoint and was stratified by demographics, admitting service, surgical findings, and physiology. Comparisons between OR and BSL were by Fisher's exact and Mann–Whitney tests. Results 144 patients underwent emergency laparotomy (45 BSL vs. 99 OR). Overall mortality was 55.6% (77.8% BSL vs. 45.5% OR; p < 0.001). Mortality by admitting service was cardiac 71.4% (n=42), medical 70% (n=30), ACS 42% (n=50), and other 36.4% (n=22) services. Preoperative lactate levels were higher in nonsurvivors (2.7 vs. 8.5 mmol/L, p < 0.001), as was vasopressor use (62.5% vs. 97.5%, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (51.6% vs. 72.5%, p < 0.01), leukocytosis (53.1% vs. 71.3%, p < 0.04), and anemia (45.3% vs. 71.3%, p < 0.01). The presence of any identifiable abdominal pathology established a 90% mortality rate. Conclusions The need for BSL portends an extremely high mortality rate and is likely useful in preintervention counselling. Emergency OR laparotomy leads to mortality in nearly half of such patients and is anticipatable based on concurrent abnormal physiology.

Diagnostic challenges in postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in critically ill patients: When to reoperate?

“…In a critical study on exploratory laparotomy, BSL (Bedside Exploratory Laparotomy) in the ICU was compared with emergency laparotomy in the operating room. The study reported 77.8% mortality in BSL and 45.5% in laparotomy [104]. This result does not suggest that BSL has higher mortality risks than laparotomy.…”

“…This result underscores the ICU setting's mortality risk and the importance of timely and adequate surgical intervention. In cases where there are no rapid ways available to support the surgical decision process, emergent laparotomy may be used to identify surgically correctable causes, despite the anticipated high mortality with laparotomy [62,104,105,106].…”

Septic Shock in Pregnancy Caused by Acute Chorioamnionitis: Diagnosis, Surgical Selection, and Hemodynamic Therapy

“…It has been proposed that critically ill patients receive emergency surgery at the ICU's bedside, in order to avoid the risk of transport. However, operation at the bedside remains less well studied and studies that have investigated it have found it has worse outcomes (Martin et al, 2018). Therefore, patients need an accurate evaluation by a MDT which includes physicians in gynaecology and obstetrics, critical care medicine and anesthesiology (Rosen et al, 2018).…”

Addressing Futility: A Practical Approach

“…Furthermore, while for certain clinical situations (e.g., laparotomy in critically ill patients [ 18 ] or intensive multiple organ support in acute-on-chronic liver failure [ 19 ]), the use of risk-calculators based on large national datasets aid us in identifying defensible cutoffs at which an intervention is not medically justified, for many other clinical situations the assessment of likelihood of benefit is necessarily based on a provider’s anecdotal experience and clinical plus ethical judgment. When considering valve replacement for an IV drug user, a surgeon’s assessment of relapse risk is subject to prior patient experiences and personal views about substance users’ deservingness of high-cost and limited resources ( 20 ).…”